대표권 소멸과 소송절차 중단시점, 그리고 상소제기 특별수권의 범위 — 대법원 2016. 9. 8. 선고, 2015다39357 판결을 중심으로 —
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 유병현 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-02T00:41:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-02T00:41:08Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-04-01 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-7686 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/139429 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article is intended to analyse the supreme court decision 2015da39357 decided September 8, 2016, which has several civil procedure law issues on the Interruption point of proceedings when a party, representative of a corporation, loses it’s power of agency, and the scope of an litigation representative’s special authority to file an appeal. Firstly, The Supreme Court maintains the position that the proceedings represented by an litigation representative shall not be interrupted when a representative of corporation loses the power of agency though there is no notification of power of agency, and then the proceedings are interrupted when the power of attorney is terminated, that is, when the judgement is served to the litigation representative, or appealed by the litigation representative. But I think that where there is no notification of loss of power of agency, no termination of it in the proceedings, and no interruption of the proceedings when the authority of litigation representative is expired. Secondly, the Supreme Court has the position that the special authority of litigation representative to file an appeal is not the authority of performing the whole proceedings, but the one of submitting a notice of an appeal. In my opinion, the power of attorney to file an appeal shall not be expired when the notice of an appeal is submitted, but when the whole proceedings are terminated. The authority of filing an appeal(§ 90 II ③ Civil Procedure Act) is the authority of performing power of attorney by the end of the proceedings. | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 한국민사소송법학회 | - |
dc.title | 대표권 소멸과 소송절차 중단시점, 그리고 상소제기 특별수권의 범위 — 대법원 2016. 9. 8. 선고, 2015다39357 판결을 중심으로 — | - |
dc.title.alternative | The Proceeding Interruption for Extinction of Corporation Representative’s Power of Agency, and the Special Authority of a Litigation Representative to File an Appeal -Focused on Supreme Court Decision 2015da39357 decided September 8, 2016 - | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 유병현 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 민사소송, v.26, no.1, pp.135 - 169 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 민사소송 | - |
dc.citation.title | 민사소송 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 26 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 135 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 169 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002819289 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | interruption of proceedings | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | notification | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | power of agency | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | power of attorney | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | special authority to file an appeal | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 대표권 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 상소제기의 특별수권 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 소송대리권 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 소송절차의 중단 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 통지 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.