Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

What do you mean by contrast in syntax?

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author송상헌-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-09T17:40:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-09T17:40:57Z-
dc.date.created2022-04-08-
dc.date.issued2017-11-
dc.identifier.issn12291374-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/139805-
dc.description.abstractThe present work proposes a non-binary evaluation of contrast in syntax and elaborates the benefits of considering gradience and degree in syntactic study. Contrast is one of the most important notions in contemporary linguistics, but the field lacks consensus about its definition and its role. Syntactic contrast has long been used in the field as a binary means of distinguishing grammatical from ungrammatical sentences via introspective judgments. Given that not all (un)grammatical sentences sound equally good or bad, contrasts should also be posited as gradient, thereby being measurable on a continuum of acceptability. The present study argues that a gradient view of syntactic contrasts is often more informative, revealing a greater variety of syntactic underpinnings in human language. To substantiate the merits of the gradient view of contrast over the dichotomous view, the present study presents results from a series of experiments conducted on Korean. The test items consist of 287 sentence pairs randomly extracted from Studies of Generative Grammar 1991-2014. The experimental tasks include a two-alternative forced choice task, a binary yes/no task, and a 5-point Likert scale task. The analysis is four-pronged covering direction, position, distance, and intensity of contrast.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherINSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF LANGUAGE AND INFORMATIONLERI@KHU.AC.KR-
dc.titleWhat do you mean by contrast in syntax?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor송상헌-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, v.34, no.3, pp.387 - 426-
dc.relation.isPartOfLINGUISTIC RESEARCH-
dc.citation.titleLINGUISTIC RESEARCH-
dc.citation.volume34-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage387-
dc.citation.endPage426-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoracceptability judgments-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcontrast-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordichotomy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorgradience-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorlanguage experiments-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Liberal Arts > Department of Linguistics > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE