Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Yeo Jin-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, In Young-
dc.contributor.authorYeom, Suk Keu-
dc.contributor.authorCha, Sang Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Yunsub-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Hyun Jong-
dc.contributor.authorShim, Euddeum-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-17T19:41:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-17T19:41:55Z-
dc.date.created2022-05-17-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn2514-8281-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/141161-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the image quality of CT obtained using a deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) engine with images with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (AV). Materials and Methods: Using a phantom, the noise power spectrum (NPS) and taskbased transfer function (TTF) were measured in images with different reconstructions (filtered back projection [FBP], AV30, 50, 100, DLIR-L, M, H) at multiple doses. One hundred and twenty abdominal CTs with 30% dose reduction were processed using AV30, AV50, DLIR-L, M, H. Objective and subjective analyses were performed. Results: The NPS peak of DLIR was lower than that of AV30 or AV50. Compared with AV30, the NPS average spatial frequencies were higher with DLIR-L or DLIR-M. For lower contrast objects, TTF in images with DLIR were higher than those with AV. The standard deviation in DLIR-H and DLIR-M was significantly lower than AV30 and AV50. The overall image quality was the best for DLIR-M (p < 0.001). Conclusions: DLIR showed improved image quality and decreased noise under a decreased radiation dose.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherUBIQUITY PRESS LTD-
dc.subjectFILTERED BACK-PROJECTION-
dc.subjectALGORITHM-
dc.subjectQUALITY-
dc.titleEvaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYeom, Suk Keu-
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/jbsr.2638-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85129728570-
dc.identifier.wosid000788508800003-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, v.106, no.1-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY-
dc.citation.titleJOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY-
dc.citation.volume106-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFILTERED BACK-PROJECTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusALGORITHM-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQUALITY-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordeep learning-based image reconstruction-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcomputed tomography-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorimage quality-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE