Single-Port vs Multiport Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Comparative Study
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Noh, Tae Il | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Young Jin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shim, Ji Sung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Seok Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheon, Jun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jeong Gu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Sung Gu | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-13T20:40:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-13T20:40:42Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-08-12 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0892-7790 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/143071 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent single-port (SP) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) (SP-RARP) with those who underwent multiport (MP) RARP (MP-RARP).Methods: Data on 40 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RARP between June 2020 and February 2021 and 129 who underwent MP-RARP between June 2019 and February 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Using logistic regression, 31 patients who underwent SP-RARP were matched to 31 patients who underwent MP-RARP (1:1) based on propensity scores. The available perioperative parameters and outcomes were analyzed.Results: Compared with MP-RARP, SP-RARP showed no significant differences in perioperative parameters, including the console time (111.0 +/- 15.7 vs 102.6 +/- 18.8 minutes, p = 0.569), operation time (151.3 +/- 15.1 vs 158.7 +/- 20.3 minutes, p = 0.863), estimated blood loss (121.1 +/- 64.7 vs 140.5 +/- 90.5 mL, p = 0.638), positive surgical margins (19.4% in both groups), and 3-month continence (77.4% vs 83.9%, p = 0.563) and potency (45.2% vs 48.4%, p = 0.891) rates. Patients who underwent SP-RARP had lower proportions of complete nerve sparing than those who underwent MP-RARP (SP-RARP vs MP-RARP in subjective scores: 4.0 +/- 0.8 vs 4.4 +/- 0.9, p = 0.046; SP-RARP vs MP-RARP in pathologic score of 5, 35.5% vs 64.5%, p = 0.049; score of 4, 41.9% vs 19.4%, p = 0.038; score of 3, 19.4% vs 9.7%, p = 0.398; score of 2, 3.2% vs 0.0%, p = 0.365; and score of 1, 3.2% vs 3.2%, p = 0.932, respectively).Conclusions: SP-RARP showed lower nerve-sparing scores than MP-RARP. The present study suggests that SP-RARP is safe and feasible with short-term functional outcomes comparable to those of MP-RARP. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC | - |
dc.subject | SURGERY | - |
dc.title | Single-Port vs Multiport Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Comparative Study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Cheon, Jun | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1089/end.2021.0660 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85130754312 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000798187300015 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, v.36, no.5, pp.661 - 667 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 36 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 661 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 667 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Urology & Nephrology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Urology & Nephrology | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SURGERY | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | da Vinci Single Port | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | prostate cancer | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.