A Note on IHRCs: Restrictives vs. Non-Restrictives
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김랑혜윤 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-06T15:42:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-06T15:42:01Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-10-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1225-6048 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/144134 | - |
dc.description.abstract | It is well-known that Korean/Japanese IHRCs have definite force (Hoshi 1995; Shimoyama 1999, 2001; M. Kim 2004, 2007; Lee 2006). As such, Grosu and Hoshi (2019) argue that they should be treated as predicate-denoting relatives since all the other definite relatives denote predicates. Accepting this argument, Korean and Japanese IHRCs are restrictives rather than appositives since it is a general assumption that restrictives denote predicates, while appositives denote propositions. This paper claims that Korean(Japanese) IHRCs are non-restrictives in line with Kitagawa (2005, 2019) and Lee (2006), based on the similarities between Korean(Japanese) IHRCs and the best-known cases of appositives, i.e. the English cases. Presenting the dissimilarities at the same time, this paper argues that Korean(Japanese) IHRCs are not simply non-restrictives but rather ‘integrated’ non-restrictives in Cinque’s (2020) sense, while the best-known cases of appositives are ‘non-integrated’ non-restrictives. Deriving the similarities and the dissimilarities from the structural grounds, this paper comes to imply that kes in Korean can be used as a kind of saving device, i.e., a resumptive pronoun in Cinque’s (2020) sense, which is employed when deletion does not work due to lack of identity. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 한국생성문법학회 | - |
dc.title | A Note on IHRCs: Restrictives vs. Non-Restrictives | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Note on IHRCs: Restrictives vs. Non-Restrictives | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김랑혜윤 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15860/sigg.32.3.202208.551 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 생성문법연구, v.32, no.3, pp.551 - 578 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 생성문법연구 | - |
dc.citation.title | 생성문법연구 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 32 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 551 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 578 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002876720 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | appositive | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | integration | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | internal head | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | kes | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | maximality | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | restrictive | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | resumptive pronoun | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | split antecedent | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.