Multilateralism in Great Power Politics: Building Order or Inviting Conflict?*
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, S.-W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, J.J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-19T22:40:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-19T22:40:18Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-11-18 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1016-3271 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/146020 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Though the United States and China emphasize the significance of multilateral frameworks, they have not departed from power politics. As the confrontation between U.S.-led and Chinese-style multilateralism intensifies, the practice of multilateral cooperation based on openness and responsibility is losing ground. In this context, this paper compares U.S.-led multilateralism and Chinese-style multilateralism to examine U.S.–China rivalry in multilateral mechanisms. It then zooms in on the rivalry in the context of the Indo–Pacific region. U.S. President Biden’s key strategy in his China policy is represented by the catchphrase “cooperate, compete, confront,” dubbed the “3C framework,” reflecting the complexities of U.S.–China relations. While the two states tend to show a mix of competition and cooperation relative to global multilateral mechanisms, they exhibit a mix of competition and conflict in the Indo–Pacific. The paper analyzes recent United States and Chinese approaches towards topical multilateral issues: on climate change issues for the former and on cybersecurity and advanced technology for the latter. © 2022 Korea Institute for Defense Analyses. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Korea Institute for Defense Analyses | - |
dc.title | Multilateralism in Great Power Politics: Building Order or Inviting Conflict?* | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, S.-W. | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.22883/kjda.2022.34.3.003 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85137336270 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, v.34, no.3, pp.385 - 409 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Korean Journal of Defense Analysis | - |
dc.citation.title | Korean Journal of Defense Analysis | - |
dc.citation.volume | 34 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 385 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 409 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002872883 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 3C framework | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Chinese-style multilateralism | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | climate change | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cybersecurity | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | minilateralism | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | multilateralism | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | U.S.-led security network | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | U.S.–China strategic rivalry | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.