Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Multilateralism in Great Power Politics: Building Order or Inviting Conflict?*

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, S.-W.-
dc.contributor.authorPark, J.J.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-19T22:40:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-19T22:40:18Z-
dc.date.created2022-11-18-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn1016-3271-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/146020-
dc.description.abstractThough the United States and China emphasize the significance of multilateral frameworks, they have not departed from power politics. As the confrontation between U.S.-led and Chinese-style multilateralism intensifies, the practice of multilateral cooperation based on openness and responsibility is losing ground. In this context, this paper compares U.S.-led multilateralism and Chinese-style multilateralism to examine U.S.–China rivalry in multilateral mechanisms. It then zooms in on the rivalry in the context of the Indo–Pacific region. U.S. President Biden’s key strategy in his China policy is represented by the catchphrase “cooperate, compete, confront,” dubbed the “3C framework,” reflecting the complexities of U.S.–China relations. While the two states tend to show a mix of competition and cooperation relative to global multilateral mechanisms, they exhibit a mix of competition and conflict in the Indo–Pacific. The paper analyzes recent United States and Chinese approaches towards topical multilateral issues: on climate change issues for the former and on cybersecurity and advanced technology for the latter. © 2022 Korea Institute for Defense Analyses.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherKorea Institute for Defense Analyses-
dc.titleMultilateralism in Great Power Politics: Building Order or Inviting Conflict?*-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, S.-W.-
dc.identifier.doi10.22883/kjda.2022.34.3.003-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85137336270-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKorean Journal of Defense Analysis, v.34, no.3, pp.385 - 409-
dc.relation.isPartOfKorean Journal of Defense Analysis-
dc.citation.titleKorean Journal of Defense Analysis-
dc.citation.volume34-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage385-
dc.citation.endPage409-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART002872883-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor3C framework-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorChinese-style multilateralism-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorclimate change-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcybersecurity-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorminilateralism-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormultilateralism-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorU.S.-led security network-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorU.S.–China strategic rivalry-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Political Science & Economics > Department of Political Science and International Relations > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE