Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Religiosity and Individual Agency: Denominational Affiliation, Religious Action, and Sense of Control (SOC) in Life

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorShim, Jae-Mahn-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-30T03:05:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-30T03:05:39Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-19-
dc.date.issued2021-02-
dc.identifier.issn2077-1444-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/49638-
dc.description.abstractBy reporting findings from Wave 6 of the World Values Survey, this paper presents a renewed understanding of the relationship between religiosity and individual agency that is defined as sense of control (SOC) in life. In doing so, it proposes two conceptual articulations of religiosity. First, it articulates religiosity to be composed of categorical (i.e., denominational affiliation) and substantive (i.e., religious action) aspects. Second, it articulates substantive religious action to be multivocal, involving individual-affective, individual-practical, and collective-practical action. The paper finds that categorical denominational affiliation has varying effects on SOC, whereas substantive religious action mediates these effects in such a way that it consistently boosts SOC. A positive association between denominational affiliation (vs. non-affiliation) and SOC becomes smaller when religious action is accounted for. A negative association becomes greater when religious action is accounted for. In sum, the paper argues for the positive mediating effect of religious action on the varying relationship between denominational affiliation and SOC.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.titleReligiosity and Individual Agency: Denominational Affiliation, Religious Action, and Sense of Control (SOC) in Life-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShim, Jae-Mahn-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rel12020117-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85101570553-
dc.identifier.wosid000623195900001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRELIGIONS, v.12, no.2, pp.1 - 16-
dc.relation.isPartOfRELIGIONS-
dc.citation.titleRELIGIONS-
dc.citation.volume12-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage1-
dc.citation.endPage16-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassahci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaReligion-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryReligion-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSELF-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINVOLVEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIDENTIFICATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIDENTITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusKOREA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRACE-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorreligiosity-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordenominational affiliation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorreligious action-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsense of control (SOC)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoragency-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Liberal Arts > Department of Sociology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE