Models for autoregressive processes of bounded counts: How different are they?
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hee-Young | - |
dc.contributor.author | Weiss, Christian H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Moeller, Tobias A. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-30T07:07:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-30T07:07:30Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-18 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0943-4062 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/51355 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We focus on purely autoregressive (AR)-type models defined on the bounded range {0, 1, ... , n} with a fixed upper limit n is an element of N. These include the binomial AR model, binomial AR conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) model, binomial-variation AR model with their linear conditional mean, nonlinear max-binomial AR model, and binomial logit-ARCH model. We consider the key problem of identifying which of these AR-type models is the true data-generating process. Despite the volume of the literature on model selection, little is known about this procedure in the context of nonnested and nonlinear time series models for counts. We consider the most popular approaches used for model identification, Akaike's information criterion and the Bayesian information criterion, and compare them using extensive Monte Carlo simulations. Furthermore, we investigate the properties of the fitted models (both the correct and wrong models) obtained usingmaximum likelihood estimation. Areal-data example demonstrates our findings. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER HEIDELBERG | - |
dc.subject | TIME-SERIES | - |
dc.subject | CRITERIA | - |
dc.title | Models for autoregressive processes of bounded counts: How different are they? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Hee-Young | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00180-020-00980-6 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85082932407 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000521924300001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, v.35, no.4, pp.1715 - 1736 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS | - |
dc.citation.title | COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS | - |
dc.citation.volume | 35 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1715 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1736 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Mathematics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Statistics & Probability | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TIME-SERIES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CRITERIA | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Binomial autoregressive models | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Count time series | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Model adequacy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Model selection | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Parameter estimation | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.