Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Models for autoregressive processes of bounded counts: How different are they?

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hee-Young-
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, Christian H.-
dc.contributor.authorMoeller, Tobias A.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-30T07:07:30Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-30T07:07:30Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-18-
dc.date.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.issn0943-4062-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/51355-
dc.description.abstractWe focus on purely autoregressive (AR)-type models defined on the bounded range {0, 1, ... , n} with a fixed upper limit n is an element of N. These include the binomial AR model, binomial AR conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) model, binomial-variation AR model with their linear conditional mean, nonlinear max-binomial AR model, and binomial logit-ARCH model. We consider the key problem of identifying which of these AR-type models is the true data-generating process. Despite the volume of the literature on model selection, little is known about this procedure in the context of nonnested and nonlinear time series models for counts. We consider the most popular approaches used for model identification, Akaike's information criterion and the Bayesian information criterion, and compare them using extensive Monte Carlo simulations. Furthermore, we investigate the properties of the fitted models (both the correct and wrong models) obtained usingmaximum likelihood estimation. Areal-data example demonstrates our findings.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG-
dc.subjectTIME-SERIES-
dc.subjectCRITERIA-
dc.titleModels for autoregressive processes of bounded counts: How different are they?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Hee-Young-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00180-020-00980-6-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85082932407-
dc.identifier.wosid000521924300001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCOMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, v.35, no.4, pp.1715 - 1736-
dc.relation.isPartOfCOMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS-
dc.citation.titleCOMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS-
dc.citation.volume35-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage1715-
dc.citation.endPage1736-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaMathematics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryStatistics & Probability-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTIME-SERIES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCRITERIA-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBinomial autoregressive models-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCount time series-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorModel adequacy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorModel selection-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorParameter estimation-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Public Policy > Division of Big Data Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Hee Young photo

Kim, Hee Young
공공정책대학 (빅데이터사이언스학부)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE