Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Does descriptive representation increase perceptions of legitimacy? Evidence from Australia

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSnagovsky, Feodor-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Woo Chang-
dc.contributor.authorSheppard, Jillian-
dc.contributor.authorBiddle, Nicholas-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-30T12:14:05Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-30T12:14:05Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-19-
dc.date.issued2020-10-01-
dc.identifier.issn1036-1146-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/52505-
dc.description.abstractHow does the descriptive representation of ethnic minorities affect how voters feel about the responsiveness of government? While there are many theoretical arguments that descriptive representation increases perceptions of legitimacy, the empirical evidence of this link is limited. We use survey data from the Australian Election Study and a separate conjoint experiment to evaluate whether the presence of ethnic minority candidates changes voters' perceptions of government responsiveness. We find ethnic minority Australians do not appear to have higher levels of external efficacy when voting for an ethnic minority candidate. By contrast, white-Anglo respondents have lower levels of external efficacy when voting for a non-Anglo candidate. The results inform the continuing debate on how group consciousness affects political behavior.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD-
dc.subjectSUBSTANTIVE REPRESENTATION-
dc.subjectGROUP CONSCIOUSNESS-
dc.subjectATTITUDES-
dc.subjectIDENTITY-
dc.subjectRACE-
dc.subjectAMERICANS-
dc.subjectTRUST-
dc.subjectUS-
dc.titleDoes descriptive representation increase perceptions of legitimacy? Evidence from Australia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKang, Woo Chang-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10361146.2020.1804834-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85089443237-
dc.identifier.wosid000558966100001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, v.55, no.4, pp.378 - 398-
dc.relation.isPartOfAUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-
dc.citation.titleAUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-
dc.citation.volume55-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage378-
dc.citation.endPage398-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGovernment & Law-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPolitical Science-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSUBSTANTIVE REPRESENTATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGROUP CONSCIOUSNESS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusATTITUDES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIDENTITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRACE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAMERICANS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRUST-
dc.subject.keywordPlusUS-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDescriptive representation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorresponsiveness-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorethnicity-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorexternal efficacy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorgroup consciousness-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Political Science & Economics > Department of Political Science and International Relations > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE