Group identification: An integrated approach
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Wonki Jo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ju, Biung-Ghi | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-30T15:39:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-30T15:39:46Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-18 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-09 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0899-8256 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/53621 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Consider social decision rules identifying two or more groups by aggregating individual opinions on who belong to which group. We search for rules respecting cross-group independence in the aggregation process. This independence axiom or its variants, together with other implicit constraints in the two models by Miller (2008) and Cho and Ju (2017), characterize a restricted family of rules; the only "democratic" rule in this family is the liberal rule. Our new framework provides a unified perspective on the main results of the two papers and uncovers implicit constraints in their modeling. Once those constraints are weakened, there emerge a richer family of independent rules including the consent rules (Samet and Schmeidler, 2003). The standard majority rule and many other democratic rules lying between the majority and liberal rules are examples. We also provide a characterization of the consent rules. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE | - |
dc.subject | LIBERALISM | - |
dc.title | Group identification: An integrated approach | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Cho, Wonki Jo | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.geb.2020.05.009 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85088291884 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000566721400010 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, v.123, pp.171 - 181 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR | - |
dc.citation.title | GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR | - |
dc.citation.volume | 123 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 171 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 181 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Economics | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LIBERALISM | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Group identification | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Independence | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Consistency | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | One-vote rules | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Liberal rule | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Consent rules | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Boolean algebra | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.