Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA (R) versus CELEBREX (R) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial

Authors
Kim, Hyun-SookChoi, Won-HoKim, Bo YoungKim, Sung SooLee, Sang-IlKim, Sang-HyonChoi, Sung JaeKim, Geun-TaeHur, Jin-WukLee, Myeung-SuKim, Yun SungHong, Seung-Jae
Issue Date
6월-2020
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Keywords
CELBESTA®; CELEBREX®; gastrointestinal toxicity; Korea; non-inferiority; pain relief; renal toxicity; rheumatoid arthritis
Citation
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, v.48, no.6
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume
48
Number
6
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/55545
DOI
10.1177/0300060520931323
ISSN
0300-0605
Abstract
Objectives: Celecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor that is commonly used to reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). CELBESTA (R) is a generic equivalent to CELEBREX (R), a celecoxib preparation. This study compared the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA (R) and CELEBREX in patients with RA. Methods: This was a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority clinical trial. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in self-assessed pain intensity determined using a 100-mm visual analog scale after 6 weeks of treatment. Results: After a washout period, 119 eligible subjects were randomized to one of two groups (CELBESTA (R) group, n = 61; CELEBREX (R) group, n = 58). CELBESTA (R) was not inferior to CELEBREX (R) because the upper limit of two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the two groups (difference in the least square [LS] mean, -8.68 mm; two-sided 95% CI -16.59 mm to -0.77 mm) was less than the non-inferiority margin (10 mm). There were no significant differences in GI complications and renal toxicity. Conclusions: CELBESTA (R) was not inferior to CELEBREX (R) with regard to the pain relief efficacy in RA patients, and the tolerability and safety profiles were excellent and at similar levels for both preparations.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE