Doctor and patient awareness of treatment options for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN 1): a survey questionnaire approach
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Hyun-Woong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Soo-Young | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Youn-Ji | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ouh, Yung-Taek | - |
dc.contributor.author | Min, Kyung-Jin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Sang-Noon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hong, Jin-Hwa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Song, Jae-Yun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Nak Woo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jae Kwan | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-31T10:11:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-31T10:11:00Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-02-17 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0144-3615 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/57632 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to investigate doctors' and patients' perceptions of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN 1) and its treatment methods. A survey questionnaire was offered to obstetrics and gynaecology doctors and patients with CIN 1 in 2017. Only 43% of patients knew of this disease. Regarding perceptions of its aetiology, 64% of the patients perceived human papillomavirus infection to be the main cause of CIN 1. Patients' most preferred treatments were medication (20%), followed by alternative treatment (14%). Among doctors, regular follow-up was the most preferred method for managing CIN 1. The survey showed that current treatment modalities for CIN 1 were satisfactory to only half of doctors (50%) and patients (53%). Overall, 70% of doctors responded that new drug development for CIN 1 is needed. Although, CIN 1 is a low-grade lesion, doctors and patients expressed the desire for new therapeutic agents to manage it.IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? In general, treatment is not recommended for CIN 1 because lesions are considered indicative of transient HPV infection and spontaneously regress in most patients. What do the results of this study add? Regular follow-up for CIN 1 were satisfactory to only half of doctors and patients. Thirty-six percent of patients wanted active treatment instead of regular follow-up. In addition, 70% of doctors responded that new drug development for CIN 1 is needed. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC | - |
dc.subject | NATURAL-HISTORY | - |
dc.subject | FOLLOW-UP | - |
dc.subject | CONSENSUS GUIDELINES | - |
dc.subject | MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.subject | WOMEN | - |
dc.subject | LESIONS | - |
dc.subject | CONSEQUENCES | - |
dc.subject | COLPOSCOPY | - |
dc.subject | REGRESSION | - |
dc.subject | EFFICACY | - |
dc.title | Doctor and patient awareness of treatment options for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN 1): a survey questionnaire approach | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Cho, Hyun-Woong | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Min, Kyung-Jin | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Hong, Jin-Hwa | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Song, Jae-Yun | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Nak Woo | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Jae Kwan | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01443615.2019.1606180 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85067393829 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000484499800001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, v.40, no.2, pp.211 - 216 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 40 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 211 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 216 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Obstetrics & Gynecology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Obstetrics & Gynecology | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | NATURAL-HISTORY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FOLLOW-UP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONSENSUS GUIDELINES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | WOMEN | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LESIONS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONSEQUENCES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | COLPOSCOPY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | REGRESSION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EFFICACY | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | treatment | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | doctors | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | patients | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | survey | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | questionnaire | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.