Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Evaluation of different cleaning strategies for different types of forward osmosis membrane fouling and scaling

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Youngjin-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Sheng-
dc.contributor.authorGhaffour, Noreddine-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-31T10:13:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-31T10:13:48Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-18-
dc.date.issued2020-02-15-
dc.identifier.issn0376-7388-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/57652-
dc.description.abstractIn this study, various cleaning methods are investigated to effectively control membrane fouling (i.e., organic fouling, colloidal fouling and scaling) in forward osmosis (FO). Simple physical cleanings (i.e., hydraulic flushing and osmotic backwashing) are firstly employed to remove membrane fouling. Both methods achieved higher than 95% efficiency and osmotic backwashing has a better efficiency for organic fouling and scaling in long-term operation, but colloidal fouling was not removed. To enhance the efficiency, intense physical cleanings (i.e., air scouring and the combination of various physical cleaning) and chemical cleanings (i.e., EDTA, low pH and high pH) were conducted but could not remove the fouling layer possibly because of the polymerization of silica colloids. Lastly, four hybrid mitigation methods (i.e., low pH DS, pulsed flow, high crossflow, and periodic sparging of CO 2 saturated solution) followed by hydraulic flushing were examined. The combination of CO2 saturated solution and hydraulic flushing completely removed the fouling layer because CO2 bubbles weakened the interaction between the fouling layer and the membrane surface. Periodic air scouring also exhibited similar effect on the fouling layer. Therefore, periodic air scouring can be more feasible option to control the silica colloidal fouling but not organic fouling.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER-
dc.subjectFERTILIZER-DRAWN-
dc.subjectREMOVAL EFFICIENCY-
dc.subjectWATER-
dc.subjectFO-
dc.subjectPERFORMANCE-
dc.subjectDESALINATION-
dc.subjectHYBRID-
dc.subjectULTRAFILTRATION-
dc.subjectMECHANISMS-
dc.subjectRECOVERY-
dc.titleEvaluation of different cleaning strategies for different types of forward osmosis membrane fouling and scaling-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Youngjin-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117731-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85076140366-
dc.identifier.wosid000512677400042-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, v.596-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE-
dc.citation.titleJOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE-
dc.citation.volume596-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEngineering-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaPolymer Science-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEngineering, Chemical-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPolymer Science-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFERTILIZER-DRAWN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREMOVAL EFFICIENCY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusWATER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFO-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERFORMANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDESALINATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHYBRID-
dc.subject.keywordPlusULTRAFILTRATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMECHANISMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRECOVERY-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorForward osmosis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorColloidal organic and silica fouling-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMembrane cleaning-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFouling control-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCO2 nucleation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAir scouring-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Environmental Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE