Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jung Min-
dc.contributor.authorMin, Geeho-
dc.contributor.authorKeum, Bora-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jae Min-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seung Han-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Hyuk Soon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Eun Sun-
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Yeon Seok-
dc.contributor.authorJeen, Yoon Tae-
dc.contributor.authorChun, Hoon Jai-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hong Sik-
dc.contributor.authorUm, Soon Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Chang Duck-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-01T01:22:16Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-01T01:22:16Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-18-
dc.date.issued2019-11-
dc.identifier.issn1976-2283-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/62059-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aims: Recent studies have demonstrated that etomidate is a safe sedative drug with noninferior sedative effects. In our recent study, we revealed that etomidate/midazolam was more hemodynamically stable than propofol/midazolam in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopies. We aimed to investigate whether compared with propofol/midazolam, etomidate/midazolam causes fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events with noninferior efficacy for screening colonoscopies in patients of all ages. Methods: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind study, we prospectively enrolled 200 patients. The patients were divided into etomidate and propofol groups. The primary outcome was the occurrence of cardiopulmonary adverse events. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients with fluctuations in vital signs (oxygen desaturation and transient hypotension), adverse events interrupting the procedure, and sedation-related outcomes. Results: Adverse cardiopulmonary events were more common in the propofol group than the etomidate group (65.0% vs 51.0%, respectively; p=0.045). Forty-six patients (46.0%) in the propofol group and 29 (29.0%) in the etomidate group experienced fluctuations in their vital signs (p=0.013). The proportions of patients experiencing adverse events that interrupted the procedure, including myoclonus, were not significantly different between the two groups (etomidate: 20.0% vs propofol: 11.0%; p=0.079). Both groups had similar sedation-related outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that compared with the propofol groups, the etomidate group had a significantly lower risk of fluctuations in vital signs (odds ratio, 0.427; 95% confidence interval, 0.230 to 0.792; p=0.007). Conclusions: Compared with using propofol/midazolam, using etomidate/midazolam for screening colonoscopies results in more stable hemodynamic responses in patients of all ages; therefore, we recommend using etomidate/midazolam for colonoscopies in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherEDITORIAL OFFICE GUT & LIVER-
dc.subjectGASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY-
dc.subjectDOUBLE-BLIND-
dc.subjectPROPOFOL SEDATION-
dc.subjectINDUCED MYOCLONUS-
dc.subjectGI ENDOSCOPY-
dc.subjectANESTHESIA-
dc.subjectERCP-
dc.titleUsing Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKeum, Bora-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Jae Min-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Seung Han-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Hyuk Soon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJeen, Yoon Tae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChun, Hoon Jai-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Hong Sik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorUm, Soon Ho-
dc.identifier.doi10.5009/gnl18514-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85074961928-
dc.identifier.wosid000496945500009-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationGUT AND LIVER, v.13, no.6, pp.649 - 657-
dc.relation.isPartOfGUT AND LIVER-
dc.citation.titleGUT AND LIVER-
dc.citation.volume13-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage649-
dc.citation.endPage657-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART002522866-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryGastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDOUBLE-BLIND-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPROPOFOL SEDATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINDUCED MYOCLONUS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGI ENDOSCOPY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusANESTHESIA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusERCP-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEtomidate-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorColonoscopy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPropofol-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMidazolam-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSedation-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Hong Sik photo

Lee, Hong Sik
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE