Demonstration and evaluation of potential configuration options for shale-wastewater treatment plant by combining several unit processes
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Yonghyeon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cui, Mingcan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Jongbok | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jeong, Yunjae | - |
dc.contributor.author | Khim, Jeehyeong | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-01T06:09:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-01T06:09:44Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-09-20 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0959-6526 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/62849 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The process of shale resource exploitation causes water-related problems, and it threatens the environment and is directly connected to sustainability of the industry. As a solution, several options for treatment plant configuration of shale produced water were investigated to determine the fit-for purpose organization. The candidate processes are coagulation-flocculation (C-F), dissolved air flotation (DAF), ozonation (OZ), ion-exchange (IX), ultrafiltration (UF), and reverse-osmosis (RO). For all processes, their impacts on the features of the shale wastewater treatment were determined. The removal of oil and grease is critical for smooth operation, and could be achieved by adopting DAF ->(OZ or UF). Treatment configuration options were designed to accommodate two situations: in-site reuse and discharge-to-nature. The performance of 17 configuration options was determined and each was recommended for use as in-site reuse or discharge-to-nature applications. Generally, C-F -> DAF -> OZ -> IX is recommended for in-site reuse, and C-F -> DAF -> OZ -> UF -> RO is more suitable for discharge-to-nature. Total operating and maintenance cost of discharge plant is 2.425 times more expensive than that of in site reuse. No studies have been published to date regarding plant design with these comprehensive technologies. Therefore, this study could provide fundamental information based on experimental results and a methodology for designing treatment plant configuration to realize sustainable shale production. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD | - |
dc.subject | GAS PRODUCED WATER | - |
dc.subject | COST ESTIMATION MODELS | - |
dc.subject | RESIDUAL ALUMINUM | - |
dc.subject | FLOWBACK WATER | - |
dc.subject | ION-EXCHANGE | - |
dc.subject | MEMBRANE | - |
dc.subject | OSMOSIS | - |
dc.subject | DESALINATION | - |
dc.subject | COAGULATION | - |
dc.subject | REUSE | - |
dc.title | Demonstration and evaluation of potential configuration options for shale-wastewater treatment plant by combining several unit processes | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Choi, Jongbok | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Khim, Jeehyeong | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.381 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85067289552 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000477784000075 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, v.232, pp.867 - 876 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION | - |
dc.citation.volume | 232 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 867 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 876 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Science & Technology - Other Topics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Environmental Sciences & Ecology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Green & Sustainable Science & Technology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Environmental | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Environmental Sciences | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | GAS PRODUCED WATER | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | COST ESTIMATION MODELS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RESIDUAL ALUMINUM | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FLOWBACK WATER | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ION-EXCHANGE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MEMBRANE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | OSMOSIS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DESALINATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | COAGULATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | REUSE | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Shale-wastewater treatment | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Real-field | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Configuration organization | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Water treatment cost | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Water quality | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.