Politics of Pursuing Justice in the Aftermath of Civil Conflict
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Nam Kyu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hong, Mi Hwa | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-01T15:57:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-01T15:57:11Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-18 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-05 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-0027 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/65949 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Why do some states pursue transitional justice (TJ) in the immediate aftermath of armed conflict while others do not? What drives a state to select a particular type of justice mechanism over another? Building on the political explanations of TJ, we argue that postconflict justice (PCJ) decisions are driven by the interests and power of political elites shaped by recently ended conflicts. Our empirical analysis shows that conflict outcomes and their subsequent impact on the balance of power between the government and rebel groups are the most important determinants of PCJ decisions. Domestic trials are most likely to emerge out of a decisive, one-sided victory while truth commissions and reparations are most likely to occur after a negotiated settlement. We also find that conflict severity interacts with conflict outcomes to affect PCJ decisions. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC | - |
dc.subject | HUMAN-RIGHTS PROSECUTIONS | - |
dc.subject | TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE | - |
dc.subject | TRUTH COMMISSIONS | - |
dc.subject | PEACE | - |
dc.subject | RECONCILIATION | - |
dc.subject | STRATEGIES | - |
dc.subject | TRIALS | - |
dc.subject | INJUSTICE | - |
dc.subject | LESSONS | - |
dc.subject | IMPACT | - |
dc.title | Politics of Pursuing Justice in the Aftermath of Civil Conflict | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Nam Kyu | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0022002718788926 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85052082796 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000464281600003 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, v.63, no.5, pp.1165 - 1192 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION | - |
dc.citation.volume | 63 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1165 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1192 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | International Relations | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Government & Law | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | International Relations | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Political Science | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | HUMAN-RIGHTS PROSECUTIONS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRUTH COMMISSIONS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PEACE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RECONCILIATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | STRATEGIES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRIALS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INJUSTICE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LESSONS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | IMPACT | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | civil wars | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | human rights | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | internal armed conflict | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | tribunals | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | war crimes | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.