Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Phan, K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kahlaee, H. R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, S. H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Toh, J. W. T. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-01T18:02:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-01T18:02:24Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1123-6337 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/67098 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BackgroundThe usage of robotic surgery in rectal cancer is increasing, but there is an ongoing debate as to whether it provides any benefit. The aim of the present study was to determine if robotic surgery results in less conversion to an open operation than laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.MethodsA meta-analysis was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using Ovid Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ACP Journal Club and Database of Abstracts of Review of Effectiveness. Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score-matched (PSM) studies comparing a robotic vs. laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer surgery. The primary endpoint was conversion to open. All statistical analyses and data synthesis were conducted using STATA/IC version 142, Windows 64 bit (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA)ResultsSix hundred and twenty-one studies were identified through electronic database search. After application of selection criteria as per PRISMA and MOOSE criteria, six RCTs and five PSM articles were analyzed. From the six RCTs, 512 robotic and 519 laparoscopic cases were evaluated. There was a significantly lower rate of conversion for the robotic surgery arm (4.1% vs. 8.1%, OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.00-0.57). Of the five PSM studies, 2097 robotic and 3053 laparoscopic cases were evaluated. There was a significantly lower conversion to open rate found in the robotic surgery cohort (7.4% vs. 15.6%; OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.30-0.47). Pooled RCT and PSM data demonstrated significantly lower conversion rates for robotic surgery (6.7% vs. 14.5%; OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.30-0.46).ConclusionsRobotic surgery for rectal cancer is associated with reduced conversion to open surgery compared to a laparoscopic approach. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL | - |
dc.subject | SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject | TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION | - |
dc.subject | LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION | - |
dc.subject | PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject | ASSISTED RESECTION | - |
dc.subject | IMPACT | - |
dc.subject | RISK | - |
dc.title | Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, S. H. | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10151-018-1920-0 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85059677579 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000467660400004 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, v.23, no.3, pp.221 - 230 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.title | TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 23 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 221 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 230 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Gastroenterology & Hepatology | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Gastroenterology & Hepatology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ASSISTED RESECTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | IMPACT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RISK | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Robotic surgical procedures | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Laparoscopic surgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | RECTUM | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | surg | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Rectal cancer | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Conversion to open surgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Meta-analysis | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.