Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPhan, K.-
dc.contributor.authorKahlaee, H. R.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, S. H.-
dc.contributor.authorToh, J. W. T.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-01T18:02:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-01T18:02:24Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-19-
dc.date.issued2019-03-
dc.identifier.issn1123-6337-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/67098-
dc.description.abstractBackgroundThe usage of robotic surgery in rectal cancer is increasing, but there is an ongoing debate as to whether it provides any benefit. The aim of the present study was to determine if robotic surgery results in less conversion to an open operation than laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.MethodsA meta-analysis was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using Ovid Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ACP Journal Club and Database of Abstracts of Review of Effectiveness. Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score-matched (PSM) studies comparing a robotic vs. laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer surgery. The primary endpoint was conversion to open. All statistical analyses and data synthesis were conducted using STATA/IC version 142, Windows 64 bit (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA)ResultsSix hundred and twenty-one studies were identified through electronic database search. After application of selection criteria as per PRISMA and MOOSE criteria, six RCTs and five PSM articles were analyzed. From the six RCTs, 512 robotic and 519 laparoscopic cases were evaluated. There was a significantly lower rate of conversion for the robotic surgery arm (4.1% vs. 8.1%, OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.00-0.57). Of the five PSM studies, 2097 robotic and 3053 laparoscopic cases were evaluated. There was a significantly lower conversion to open rate found in the robotic surgery cohort (7.4% vs. 15.6%; OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.30-0.47). Pooled RCT and PSM data demonstrated significantly lower conversion rates for robotic surgery (6.7% vs. 14.5%; OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.30-0.46).ConclusionsRobotic surgery for rectal cancer is associated with reduced conversion to open surgery compared to a laparoscopic approach.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL-
dc.subjectSHORT-TERM OUTCOMES-
dc.subjectTOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION-
dc.subjectLOW ANTERIOR RESECTION-
dc.subjectPATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES-
dc.subjectASSISTED RESECTION-
dc.subjectIMPACT-
dc.subjectRISK-
dc.titleLaparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, S. H.-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10151-018-1920-0-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85059677579-
dc.identifier.wosid000467660400004-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationTECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, v.23, no.3, pp.221 - 230-
dc.relation.isPartOfTECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY-
dc.citation.titleTECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY-
dc.citation.volume23-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage221-
dc.citation.endPage230-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaSurgery-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryGastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySurgery-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSHORT-TERM OUTCOMES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLOW ANTERIOR RESECTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusASSISTED RESECTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPACT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRISK-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRobotic surgical procedures-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorLaparoscopic surgery-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRECTUM-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsurg-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRectal cancer-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorConversion to open surgery-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMeta-analysis-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE