A large scale screening study with a SMR-based BCI: Categorization of BCI users and differences in their SMR activity
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sannelli, Claudia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vidaurre, Carmen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mueller, Klaus-Robert | - |
dc.contributor.author | Blankertz, Benjamin | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-01T21:23:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-01T21:23:09Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01-25 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/68248 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) are inefficient for a non-negligible part of the population, estimated around 25%. To understand this phenomenon in Sensorimotor Rhythm (SMR) based BCIs, data from a large-scale screening study conducted on 80 novice participants with the Berlin BCI system and its standard machine-learning approach were investigated. Each participant performed one BCI session with resting state Encephalography, Motor Observation, Motor Execution and Motor Imagery recordings and 128 electrodes. A significant portion of the participants (40%) could not achieve BCI control (feedback performance > 70%). Based on the performance of the calibration and feedback runs, BCI users were stratified in three groups. Analyses directed to detect and elucidate the differences in the SMR activity of these groups were performed. Statistics on reactive frequencies, task prevalence and classification results are reported. Based on their SMR activity, also a systematic list of potential reasons leading to performance drops and thus hints for possible improvements of BCI experimental design are given. The categorization of BCI users has several advantages, allowing researchers 1) to select subjects for further analyses as well as for testing new BCI paradigms or algorithms, 2) to adopt a better subject-dependent training strategy and 3) easier comparisons between different studies. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE | - |
dc.subject | BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE | - |
dc.subject | SPATIAL FILTERS | - |
dc.subject | DIFFERENT REFERENCES | - |
dc.subject | MU-RHYTHMS | - |
dc.subject | EEG | - |
dc.subject | PERFORMANCE | - |
dc.subject | CLASSIFICATION | - |
dc.subject | MOVEMENT | - |
dc.subject | IMAGERY | - |
dc.subject | DESYNCHRONIZATION | - |
dc.title | A large scale screening study with a SMR-based BCI: Categorization of BCI users and differences in their SMR activity | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Mueller, Klaus-Robert | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0207351 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85060551021 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000457037500009 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | PLOS ONE, v.14, no.1 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | PLOS ONE | - |
dc.citation.title | PLOS ONE | - |
dc.citation.volume | 14 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Science & Technology - Other Topics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Multidisciplinary Sciences | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SPATIAL FILTERS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIFFERENT REFERENCES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MU-RHYTHMS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EEG | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PERFORMANCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CLASSIFICATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MOVEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | IMAGERY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DESYNCHRONIZATION | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.