Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Ease of Use, Preference, and Safety of the Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Disposable Pen Compared with the Reusable Device: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Switch-Over, Prospective, Phase IV Trial

Authors
Lee, Ji-EunKim, Se YoungYoo, Jae-HoHwang, Il TaeLim, Jung SubYi, Kyung HeeRhie, Young-JunLee, Gyung MinNam, Hyo-KyoungChae, Hyun WookKim, Eun YoungCheon, Chong KunLee, JieunShim, Young SukEun, YuJinKim, Eun YoungHwang, Jin Soon
Issue Date
2019
Publisher
DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
Keywords
growth hormone; disposable equipment; patient preference; usability; safety
Citation
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, v.13, pp.2195 - 2205
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE
Volume
13
Start Page
2195
End Page
2205
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/68990
DOI
10.2147/PPA.S229536
ISSN
1177-889X
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the usability and safety of the disposable pen compared to those of reusable devices in patients receiving recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment. Patients and methods: This study was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, switch-over, prospective, Phase IV trial. After screening, eligible patients who were previously treated with rhGH using a reusable device were enrolled to receive treatment with the disposable pen for 8 weeks. The ease of use, preference, and tolerability of the disposable pen compared to those of the reusable device were assessed by the subjects and/or their caregivers using a questionnaire. Adverse events were evaluated by the investigators. Results: Of 116 subjects enrolled in this study, 115 received treatment with the disposable pen and 109 completed the study. The mean age of the subjects was 9.4 years. Compared to the previous reusable device, the disposable pen was assessed as significantly easier to use (mean value 7.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) [7.45-8.30] on a numerical scale ranging from 0 (far less easy) to 10 (far easier)). Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who preferred the disposable pen to the previously used reusable device was 75.7% (95% CI [67.6%-83.8%]). The percentages of subjects who rated pain and discomfort at the injection site as "not at all" were higher after using the disposable pen compared to the reusable device. No specific safety concerns were identified. Conclusion: The disposable pen is easier to use than the reusable devices and is preferred by approximately 75% of patients receiving rhGH treatment. Moreover, the disposable pen is safe and acceptable. Therefore, it could be a good alternative to reusable devices. The disposable pen is expected to provide benefits to patients receiving rhGH treatment.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Rhie, Young Jun photo

Rhie, Young Jun
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE