Detailed Information
Cited 0 time in 
Cited 0 time in 
Cited 0 time in
Metadata Downloads
Wh-the hells in Sluicing and SwipingWh-the hells in Sluicing and Swiping
- Other Titles
- Wh-the hells in Sluicing and Swiping
- Authors
- 김정석
- Issue Date
- 2019
- Publisher
- 한국언어정보학회
- Keywords
- aggressively non-D-linked wh-expression; D-linking; enclitic; focus; polarity item; proclitic; Pseudosluicing; Sluicing; Swiping
- Citation
- 언어와 정보, v.23, no.2, pp.45 - 58
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 언어와 정보
- Volume
- 23
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 45
- End Page
- 58
- ISSN
- 1226-7430
- Abstract
- Since Ross (1969) and Rosen (1976), there has been a consensus that Swiping (= P-stranded Sprouting Sluicing) is a subtype of Sluicing. A question is then why wh-the hells are allowed in Swiping, but are not in both Merger and Pied-piped Sluicing, as first documented by Merchant (2002). Regarding this question, Sprouse (2006) argues that the difference between Sluicing and Swiping with the hell is solely due to phonological reasons. However, we argue that the difference between them results from phonological (as a proclitic) and semantic (as a polarity item) deficiencies of the hell.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.