Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques for Monthly Flow Prediction
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Alizadeh, Zahra | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yazdi, Jafar | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Joong Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Al-Shamiri, Abobakr Khalil | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-02T04:19:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-02T04:19:47Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-11 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2073-4441 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/72025 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Monthly flow predictions provide an essential basis for efficient decision-making regarding water resource allocation. In this paper, the performance of different popular data-driven models for monthly flow prediction is assessed to detect the appropriate model. The considered methods include feedforward neural networks (FFNNs), time delay neural networks (TDNNs), radial basis neural networks (RBFNNs), recurrent neural network (RNN), a grasshopper optimization algorithm (GOA)-based support vector machine (SVM) and K-nearest neighbors (KNN) model. For this purpose, the performance of each model is evaluated in terms of several residual metrics using a monthly flow time series for two real case studies with different flow regimes. The results show that the KNN outperforms the different neural network configurations for the first case study, whereas RBFNN model has better performance for the second case study in terms of the correlation coefficient. According to the accuracy of the results, in the first case study with more input features, the KNN model is recommended for short-term predictions and for the second case with a smaller number of input features, but more training observations, the RBFNN model is suitable. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
dc.subject | SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION | - |
dc.subject | NEURAL-NETWORKS | - |
dc.title | Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques for Monthly Flow Prediction | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Joong Hoon | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/w10111676 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85056799267 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000451736300183 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | WATER, v.10, no.11 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | WATER | - |
dc.citation.title | WATER | - |
dc.citation.volume | 10 | - |
dc.citation.number | 11 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Environmental Sciences & Ecology | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Water Resources | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Environmental Sciences | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Water Resources | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | NEURAL-NETWORKS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Gaussian process regression | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | grasshopper optimization algorithm | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | K-nearest neighbor regression | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | neural network | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | support vector machine | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.