Conditional Versus Unconditional Utility as Welfare Criterion: Two Examples
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jinill | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Sunghyun | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-02T14:49:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-02T14:49:38Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-16 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-03 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0927-7099 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/77290 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper provides two illustrative examples on how a choice of social welfare criterion (conditional vs. unconditional utility) can generate different welfare implications. The first example is based on the standard linear-quadratic permanent income model, and the other example uses a simple two-country DSGE model under autarky and under complete markets. When the conditional welfare criterion is used-with the social discount factor set at the private discount factor-we obtain the well-known results that the government should not intervene when there are no market imperfections and that complete markets generate risk sharing gains over autarky. In contrast, using an unconditional welfare criterion-which effectively implies that the social discount factor is set to unity-can generate unconventional welfare results. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER | - |
dc.subject | MONETARY-POLICY | - |
dc.title | Conditional Versus Unconditional Utility as Welfare Criterion: Two Examples | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Jinill | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10614-016-9635-7 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84996605666 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000426106600017 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, v.51, no.3, pp.719 - 730 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS | - |
dc.citation.title | COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS | - |
dc.citation.volume | 51 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 719 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 730 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Mathematics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Management | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MONETARY-POLICY | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Welfare criterion | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Unconditional utility | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Conditional utility | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Social discount factor | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Optimal policy | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.