Speaking to the heart: Social exclusion and reliance on feelings versus reasons in persuasion
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lu, Fang-Chi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sinha, Jayati | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-03T00:16:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-03T00:16:58Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1057-7408 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/81961 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The authors of this study identify an alternative frame of communication for persuading people who feel socially excluded to behave in ways that benefit individual and social wellbeing, regardless of future connection possibilities. The authors suggest that socially excluded (included) consumers tend to rely on affect (cognition) in processing information, and to consequently prefer persuasive messages based on feelings (reasons). The effect occurs because people tend to ruminate about exclusionary events, which depletes self-regulatory resources. Thus, distraction that interferes with rumination can mitigate the social exclusion effect on affective processing. The authors present findings from five studies across various paradigms promoting personal and social wellbeing (i.e., donating blood, recycling, and consuming healthful foods) and discuss the theoretical and policy implications. (C) 2017 Society for Consumer Psychology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD | - |
dc.subject | EGO-DEPLETION | - |
dc.subject | SELF | - |
dc.subject | NEED | - |
dc.subject | DISTRACTION | - |
dc.subject | RUMINATION | - |
dc.subject | RESPONSES | - |
dc.subject | BELONG | - |
dc.subject | INFORMATION | - |
dc.subject | OSTRACISM | - |
dc.subject | COGNITION | - |
dc.title | Speaking to the heart: Social exclusion and reliance on feelings versus reasons in persuasion | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lu, Fang-Chi | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jcps.2017.03.004 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85017452592 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000412380200001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, v.27, no.4, pp.409 - 421 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 27 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 409 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 421 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Psychology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Business | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Psychology, Applied | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EGO-DEPLETION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SELF | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | NEED | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DISTRACTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RUMINATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RESPONSES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | BELONG | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INFORMATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | OSTRACISM | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | COGNITION | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Distraction intervention | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Emotional versus rational appeals | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Persuasion | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Social exclusion | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.