Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Bacteremia Prediction Model for Community-acquired Pneumonia: External Validation in a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort

Authors
Kim, ByunghyunChoi, JunghoKim, KyuseokJang, SujinShin, Tae GunKim, Won YoungKim, Jung-YounPark, Yoo SeokKim, Soo HyunLee, Hui JaiShin, JonghwanYou, Je SungKim, Kyung SuChung, Sung Phil
Issue Date
10월-2017
Publisher
WILEY
Citation
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, v.24, no.10, pp.1226 - 1234
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume
24
Number
10
Start Page
1226
End Page
1234
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/82162
DOI
10.1111/acem.13255
ISSN
1069-6563
Abstract
Objective: Many studies have described constructing a prediction model for bacteremia in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but these studies were not validated in external heterogeneous groups. The objective of this study was to test the generalizability of a previous bacteremia prediction model for CAP by external validation. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort analysis was performed in eight tertiary urban hospital emergency departments (EDs). We reviewed adult patients who were hospitalized after presentation to the ED with CAP. We categorized the enrolled patients into three groups according to the bacteremia prediction model score and calculated the number of patients with or without a blood culture-positive result. We performed a multivariable analysis to identify significant predictors for bacteremia. Results: Among the enrolled 2,001 patients, 1,592 (79.6%), 371 (18.5%), and 38 (1.9%) were stratified to a low-, moderate-, and high-risk group, respectively, and this proportion was similar with previous study. Each group had a bacteremia-positive rate as follows: 1.2% for the low-risk group, 7.2% for the moderate-risk group, and 31.5% for the high-risk group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the bacteremia model in the external validation cohort was 0.81, and there was no significant difference with that of the previous internal validation cohort (p=0.246). Assuming that blood cultures were not performed in the low-risk patients, the sensitivity and specificity of this model were 0.68 and 0.81, respectively. Additionally, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 9.54 and 98.87%, respectively. A platelet count less than 130 x 10(9) cells/L, albumin less than 3.3 mg/dL, and C-reactive protein greater than 17 mg/dL were identified as significant predictors with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.70 and 0.83, respectively. Conclusion: The bacteremia prediction model was well validated in the general population and could help physicians make the decision to reduce the number of blood cultures in patients with CAP.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE