Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Baek, Se-Jin | - |
dc.contributor.author | 백세진 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-03T07:36:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-03T07:36:13Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-21 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-11 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0930-2794 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/83885 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Robotic surgery is increasingly used in the field of rectal cancer surgery. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection (uLAR) and coloanal anastomosis (CAA). Between January 2007 and December 2010, a retrospective chart review was performed for all patients with low rectal cancer who underwent curative uLAR and CAA with or without intersphincteric resection using either a robotic or a laparoscopic approach. The study excluded patients with tumors invading the levator ani or external sphincter, patients with T4 cancers invading the prostate or vagina, and patients for whom an open approach was used. Patients' short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated. This study enrolled 84 consecutive patients (47 in the robotic group and 37 in the laparoscopic group). The patient characteristics and operative data did not differ significantly between the groups except for the rate of conversion to open surgery (robot, 2.1 % vs laparoscopy, 16.2 %; p = 0.02). The postoperative outcomes also were similar in the two groups, but the hospital stay was shorter in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (robot, 9 days vs laparoscopy, 11 days; p = 0.011). No postoperative mortality occurred. The median follow-up | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER | - |
dc.title | Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Baek, Se-Jin | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 백세진 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00464-013-3014-4 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, v.27, pp.4157 - 4163 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | - |
dc.citation.title | SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | - |
dc.citation.volume | 27 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 4157 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 4163 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Coloanal anastomosis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Intersphincteric resection | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Laparoscopic surgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Rectal neoplasm | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Robotic surgery | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.