Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Focal fat deposition at liver MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid: Quantitative and qualitative analysis

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYeom Suk Keu-
dc.contributor.authorYEOM, Suk keu-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T07:38:01Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-03T07:38:01Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-21-
dc.date.issued2013-07-
dc.identifier.issn0730-725X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/83900-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the image findings of focal fat deposition (FFD) in the liver on gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)- and gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI, particularly during the hepatobilialy phase (HBP), and the relationship between relative enhancement (RE) and fat signal fraction (FSF) of FFD. Subjects and Methods: Twenty-one patients with 27 FFDs (mean diameter, 21.9 mm), which showed low signal intensity on opposed-phase compared with in-phase MRI, were retrospectively evaluated. RE of the liver (REliver) and FFD (REFFD) and liver-to-lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of FFD were measured on dynamic phases and HBP images with fat-saturated in-phase gradient-echo sequence. The FSF of each FFD was measured on in- and opposed-phase dual gradient-echo images. We qualitatively analyzed imaging findings of FFDs, including signal intensity, shape, margin, and homogeneity on HBP images, and enhancement pattern during dynamic phases. The correlations between REFFD and FSF and between CNR and FSF on HBP images were evaluated using Pearson`s correlation tests and a simple linear regression model. Results: There were no significant differences between REFFD and REliver in dynamic phases and HBP, regardless of contrast agents (p >= 0.075#. On HBP images, CNR #p = 0.00-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC-
dc.titleFocal fat deposition at liver MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid: Quantitative and qualitative analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYeom Suk Keu-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYEOM, Suk keu-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, v.31, no.6, pp.911 - 917-
dc.relation.isPartOfMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-
dc.citation.titleMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage911-
dc.citation.endPage917-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFocal fat deposition-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorLiver-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMRI-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGd-BOPTA-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGd-EOB-DTPA-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Yeom, Suk Keu photo

Yeom, Suk Keu
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE