Proactive multiple cardiovascular risk factor management compared with usual care in patients with hypertension and additional risk factors: the CRUCIAL trial
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim Eung Ju | - |
dc.contributor.author | SEO, HONG SEOG | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-03T09:59:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-03T09:59:11Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-21 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0300-7995 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/84615 | - |
dc.description.abstract | To investigate whether a proactive multifactorial risk factor intervention strategy using single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin (5/10, 10/10 mg) in addition to other antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy, as required, resulted in greater reduction in calculated Framingham 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk compared with usual care (UC) after 52-weeks treatment. Prospective, multinational, open-label, cluster randomized trial, with the investigator as the unit of randomization. Eligible hypertensive patients were 35--79 years of age, with epsilon a parts per thousand yen3 additional cardiovascular risk factors, but no history of CHD and baseline total cholesterol (TC) a parts per thousand currency sign6.5 mmol/l. www.ClinicalTrials.gov; trial identifier NCT00407537. The primary endpoint was calculated Framingham 10-year CHD risk at 52 weeks. Of the 140 randomized sites, 136 sites contributed 1461 patients. Mean baseline age and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were comparable between treatment arms. Mean baseline BP (150.3/89.7 vs. 144.3/86.5 mmHg) and Framingham CHD risk (20.0 vs. 18.1%%) were higher in the proactive intervention versus the UC arm (p < 0.002 for both). At week 52, mean CHD risk was 12.5%% in the proactive intervention arm and 16. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | INFORMA HEALTHCARE | - |
dc.title | Proactive multiple cardiovascular risk factor management compared with usual care in patients with hypertension and additional risk factors: the CRUCIAL trial | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim Eung Ju | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | SEO, HONG SEOG | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, v.27, no.4, pp.821 - 833 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION | - |
dc.citation.title | CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION | - |
dc.citation.volume | 27 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 821 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 833 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.