Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Proactive multiple cardiovascular risk factor management compared with usual care in patients with hypertension and additional risk factors: the CRUCIAL trial

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim Eung Ju-
dc.contributor.authorSEO, HONG SEOG-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T09:59:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-03T09:59:11Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-21-
dc.date.issued2011-04-
dc.identifier.issn0300-7995-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/84615-
dc.description.abstractTo investigate whether a proactive multifactorial risk factor intervention strategy using single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin (5/10, 10/10 mg) in addition to other antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy, as required, resulted in greater reduction in calculated Framingham 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk compared with usual care (UC) after 52-weeks treatment. Prospective, multinational, open-label, cluster randomized trial, with the investigator as the unit of randomization. Eligible hypertensive patients were 35--79 years of age, with epsilon a parts per thousand yen3 additional cardiovascular risk factors, but no history of CHD and baseline total cholesterol (TC) a parts per thousand currency sign6.5 mmol/l. www.ClinicalTrials.gov; trial identifier NCT00407537. The primary endpoint was calculated Framingham 10-year CHD risk at 52 weeks. Of the 140 randomized sites, 136 sites contributed 1461 patients. Mean baseline age and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were comparable between treatment arms. Mean baseline BP (150.3/89.7 vs. 144.3/86.5 mmHg) and Framingham CHD risk (20.0 vs. 18.1%%) were higher in the proactive intervention versus the UC arm (p < 0.002 for both). At week 52, mean CHD risk was 12.5%% in the proactive intervention arm and 16.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherINFORMA HEALTHCARE-
dc.titleProactive multiple cardiovascular risk factor management compared with usual care in patients with hypertension and additional risk factors: the CRUCIAL trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim Eung Ju-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSEO, HONG SEOG-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, v.27, no.4, pp.821 - 833-
dc.relation.isPartOfCURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION-
dc.citation.titleCURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION-
dc.citation.volume27-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage821-
dc.citation.endPage833-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles
Graduate School > Department of Biomedical Sciences > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Eung Ju photo

Kim, Eung Ju
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE