Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Preoperative Lung Localization for Pulmonary Nodules A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chul Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Kyunghwa-
dc.contributor.authorHur, Jin-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sang Min-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ji Won-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Sung Ho-
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Jae Seung-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kye Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Woocheol-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Byoung Wook-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T10:24:42Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-03T10:24:42Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-16-
dc.date.issued2017-02-
dc.identifier.issn0012-3692-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/84770-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: An optimal method of preoperative localization for pulmonary nodules has yet to be established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the success and complication rates associated with three pulmonary nodule localization methods for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): hook-wire localization, microcoil localization, and lipiodol localization. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for prospective or retrospective English language studies of VATS localization in adult patients. A noncomparative, random effects model-based meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled success and complication rates for the three localization methods. RESULTS: A total of 46 clinical studies were enrolled, including 30, 9, and 7 studies of hookwire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization, respectively. The successful targeting rates for hook-wire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99), 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively, with corresponding successful operative field targeting rates of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.96), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively. In addition, the successful VATS rates with hook-wire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively. Regarding complications, hook-wire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization were associated with pneumothorax rates of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.28-0.43), 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07-0.34), and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.20-0.46), respectively and hemorrhage rates of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-0.23), 0.06 (95% CI, 0.03-0.11), and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05-0.23), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All three localization methods yielded similarly highly successful targeting rates. However, hook-wire localization had a relatively lower successful operative field targeting rate because of dislodgement or migration. Lipiodol localization had the highest overall success rate, and microcoil localization yielded the lowest complication rates.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER-
dc.subjectASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY-
dc.subjectTOMOGRAPHY-GUIDED LOCALIZATION-
dc.subjectSHORT HOOK WIRE-
dc.subjectLIPIODOL MARKING-
dc.subjectMICROCOIL LOCALIZATION-
dc.subjectRESECTION-
dc.subjectLESIONS-
dc.subjectEXPERIENCE-
dc.subjectCOMPLICATIONS-
dc.subjectPLACEMENT-
dc.titleComparative Effectiveness and Safety of Preoperative Lung Localization for Pulmonary Nodules A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHwang, Sung Ho-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chest.2016.09.017-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85011617552-
dc.identifier.wosid000397155000020-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCHEST, v.151, no.2, pp.316 - 328-
dc.relation.isPartOfCHEST-
dc.citation.titleCHEST-
dc.citation.volume151-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage316-
dc.citation.endPage328-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGeneral & Internal Medicine-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRespiratory System-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryCritical Care Medicine-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRespiratory System-
dc.subject.keywordPlusASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTOMOGRAPHY-GUIDED LOCALIZATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSHORT HOOK WIRE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLIPIODOL MARKING-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMICROCOIL LOCALIZATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRESECTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLESIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEXPERIENCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMPLICATIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPLACEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorhook-wire-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorlipiodol-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorlocalization-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorlung nodule-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormicrocoil-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE