Clinical Effectiveness of Different Polishing Systems and Self-Etch Adhesives in Class V Composite Resin Restorations: Two-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jang, J-H | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, H-Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, S-M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, C-O | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, D. S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, K-K | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, S-Y | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-03T11:37:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-03T11:37:02Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-16 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0361-7734 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/85091 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the clinical effectiveness of different polishing systems and self-etch adhesives in class V composite resin restorations. A total of 164 noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) from 35 patients were randomly allocated to one of four experimental groups, each of which used a combination of polishing systems and adhesives. The two polishing systems used were Sof-Lex XT (Sof), a multi-step abrasive disc, and Enhance/Pogo (EP), a simplified abrasive-impregnated rubber instrument. The adhesive systems were Clearfil-SE bond (CS), a two-step self-etch adhesive, and Xeno V (XE), a one-step self-etch adhesive. All NCCLs were restored with light-cured microhybrid resin composites (Z250). Restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months by two blinded independent examiners using modified FDI criteria. The Fisher exact test and generalized estimating equation analysis considering repeated measurements were performed to compare the outcomes between the polishing systems and adhesives. Three restorations were dislodged: two in CS/Sof and one in CS/EP. None of the restorations required any repair or retreatment except those showing retention loss. Sof was superior to EP with regard to surface luster, staining, and marginal adaptation (p<0.05). CS and XE did not show differences in any criteria (p>0.05). Sof is clinically superior to EP for polishing performance in class V composite resin restoration. XE demonstrates clinically equivalent bonding performance to CS. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | OPERATIVE DENTISTRY INC | - |
dc.subject | WORLD DENTAL FEDERATION | - |
dc.subject | SURFACE-ROUGHNESS | - |
dc.subject | ONE-STEP | - |
dc.subject | STAINING SUSCEPTIBILITY | - |
dc.subject | CRITERIA | - |
dc.subject | GEOMETRY | - |
dc.subject | UPDATE | - |
dc.title | Clinical Effectiveness of Different Polishing Systems and Self-Etch Adhesives in Class V Composite Resin Restorations: Two-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, H-Y | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2341/16-104-C | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85008352228 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000391725100003 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, v.42, no.1, pp.19 - 29 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | OPERATIVE DENTISTRY | - |
dc.citation.title | OPERATIVE DENTISTRY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 42 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 19 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 29 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | WORLD DENTAL FEDERATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SURFACE-ROUGHNESS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ONE-STEP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | STAINING SUSCEPTIBILITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CRITERIA | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | GEOMETRY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | UPDATE | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.