Prediction of Exit Polls for the Presidential Election in 2007 and 2013 by Using Nonresponse Models
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 최보승 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김성용 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-03T12:14:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-03T12:14:54Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-2354 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/85342 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Estimation of nonresponses in exit polls frequently produces inaccurate election results. Since estimates of nonresponses differ depending on the assumed mechanism, nonresponse mechanism should be determined prior to the analysis. However, nonresponse mechanism is not testable. From this problem, estimates from all possible models need to be provided. Along with the selection of nonresponse mechanism, ML (maximum likelihood) estimates under NMAR (not missing at random) have a boundary solution problem which is that cell expectations of more than one columns are estimated as zeros. To overcome the boundary solution problem, various Bayesian models have been suggested. In this paper, ML estimation under MAR (missing at random) and NMAR as well as Bayesian estimation under NMAR are applied to the two exit polls for 2007 and 2013 Korean presidential elections with 53 contingency tables. In comparing ML and Bayesian estimates, we also consider weighting methods to reduce biases. As results, ML estimates under MAR produce more accurate election results and better than the Bayesian approaches under NMAR. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 한국자료분석학회 | - |
dc.title | Prediction of Exit Polls for the Presidential Election in 2007 and 2013 by Using Nonresponse Models | - |
dc.title.alternative | Prediction of Exit Polls for the Presidential Election in 2007 and 2013 by Using Nonresponse Models | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 최보승 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.37727/jkdas.2017.19.1.1 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, v.19, no.1, pp.1 - 9 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society | - |
dc.citation.title | Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society | - |
dc.citation.volume | 19 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 9 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002198196 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | contingency table | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | nonresponse mechanism | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | boundary solution | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | exit poll. | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.