드러리 레인 플레이빌 연구(1): 개릭의 전략
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 전준택 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-03T12:26:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-03T12:26:55Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-2668 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/85431 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article focuses on three tasks to look into Garrick’s strategy toward Drury Lane’s playbill. First, Drury Lane’s playbill of 21 Jan. 1756 proves that the double bill was very conceptual. Garrick combined his adaptation of Winter’s Tale, Florizel and Perdita as a main piece and Catharine and Petruchio, his adaptation of The Taming of the Shrew as an afterpiece. Garrick strengthened his patriarchal ideology with both pieces, upholding middle class mercantile values at the same time. Second, Garrick’s institutionalization of a pantomime illuminates the background of Garrick’s combination of Shakespeare with a pantomime as well. By downstaging Autolycus/Harlequin, Garrick’s playbill broke down the dichotomy of high/low structure of the playbill Garrick himself had hoped to establish. Third, Garrick’s strategy is different from Sheridan’s. While Garrick in 1756 angled for future George III’s favour with Florizel and Perdita, a Whig politician Sheridan in 1781 didn’t need to angle for George III’s favour with Florizel and Perdita. Therefore the aims of Sheridan’s playbill would be different from Garrick’s though the double bill would be very conceptual as well. | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 한국셰익스피어학회 | - |
dc.title | 드러리 레인 플레이빌 연구(1): 개릭의 전략 | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Study of Drury Lane’s Playbill (1): Garrick’s Strategy | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 전준택 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17009/shakes.2017.53.1.005 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Shakespeare Review, v.53, no.1, pp.97 - 116 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Shakespeare Review | - |
dc.citation.title | Shakespeare Review | - |
dc.citation.volume | 53 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 97 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 116 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002212422 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | David Garrick | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Drury Lane | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Florizel and Perdita | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Catharine and Petruchio | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Harlequin’s Invasion | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 데이비드 개릭 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 드러리 레인 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 『플로리젤과 퍼디타』 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 『캐서린과 페트루치오』 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 『할레퀸의 침입』 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.