Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Following the breadcrumbs: An analysis of online product review characteristics by online shoppers

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorMuralidharan, S.-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, H.J.-
dc.contributor.authorSung, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorMiller, J.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, A.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T14:04:01Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-03T14:04:01Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-17-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn1352-7266-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/86105-
dc.description.abstractConsumer-generated product reviews are a driving force behind online purchases; at the same time, unfavorable reviews can discourage interested online shoppers and eventually hurt the brand. The objective of this exploratory study was to analyze a diverse range of characteristics and the valence of online product reviews that would aid in responding to customer dissatisfaction. Product reviews (N = 1982) from Amazon.com were collected and content analyzed. Some of the key findings include the following: (a) price was the most commonly discussed product feature; (b) online shoppers found two-sided reviews to be most informative, contradicting the commonly held assumption that negative reviews were more informative and diagnostic in nature; and (c) ‘no action’ was the most common end action across two-sided and negative reviews, indicating that varying levels of dissatisfaction might not always lead to a negative end action. Implications for marketers are discussed. © 2014 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherRoutledge-
dc.titleFollowing the breadcrumbs: An analysis of online product review characteristics by online shoppers-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSung, Y.-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13527266.2014.949824-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85028254104-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Marketing Communications, v.23, no.2, pp.113 - 134-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Marketing Communications-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Marketing Communications-
dc.citation.volume23-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage113-
dc.citation.endPage134-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoremotions-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorend actions-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoronline product reviews-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorreview quality-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorreview valence-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsatisfaction-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
School of Psychology > School of Psychology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE