Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Validity of Time Reversal for Testing Granger Causality

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorWinkler, Irene-
dc.contributor.authorPanknin, Danny-
dc.contributor.authorBartz, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Klaus-Robert-
dc.contributor.authorHaufe, Stefan-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T23:03:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-03T23:03:28Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-18-
dc.date.issued2016-06-01-
dc.identifier.issn1053-587X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/88375-
dc.description.abstractInferring causal interactions from observed data is a challenging problem, especially in the presence of measurement noise. To alleviate the problem of spurious causality, Haufe et al. (2013) proposed to contrast measures of information flow obtained on the original data against the same measures obtained on time-reversed data. They show that this procedure, time-reversed Granger causality (TRGC), robustly rejects causal interpretations on mixtures of independent signals. While promising results have been achieved in simulations, it was so far unknown whether time reversal leads to valid measures of information flow in the presence of true interaction. Here, we prove that, for linear finite-order autoregressive processes with unidirectional information flow between two variables, the application of time reversal for testing Granger causality indeed leads to correct estimates of information flow and its directionality. Using simulations, we further show that TRGC is able to infer correct directionality with similar statistical power as the net Granger causality between two variables, while being much more robust to the presence of measurement noise.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC-
dc.subjectEEG DATA-
dc.subjectCONNECTIVITY-
dc.subjectINFERENCE-
dc.subjectFLOW-
dc.titleValidity of Time Reversal for Testing Granger Causality-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorMueller, Klaus-Robert-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TSP.2016.2531628-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84968765214-
dc.identifier.wosid000374993300002-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, v.64, no.11, pp.2746 - 2760-
dc.relation.isPartOfIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING-
dc.citation.titleIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING-
dc.citation.volume64-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage2746-
dc.citation.endPage2760-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEngineering-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEngineering, Electrical & Electronic-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEEG DATA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONNECTIVITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINFERENCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFLOW-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGranger causality-
dc.subject.keywordAuthortime reversal-
dc.subject.keywordAuthornoise-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTRGC-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Artificial Intelligence > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE