Epicardial thoracoscopic ablation versus endocardial catheter ablation for management of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hyun Jung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jin Suk | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Tae Sik | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-03T23:29:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-03T23:29:09Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-18 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1569-9293 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/88545 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: In the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the efficacy and safety of epicardial thoracoscopic ablation (TA) versus endocardial catheter ablation (CA) using radiofrequency energy remains unclear. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of each ablation technique using a pooled comparative analysis. METHODS: Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of TA and CA were identified by searching electronic databases. Those that reported patients' freedom from atrial arrhythmia and significant side effects were included. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two retrospective cohort studies with a total of 587 patients were included in the meta-analysis (273 patients underwent TA and 314 patients underwent CA). The proportion of patients who were free of atrial arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic drugs during 12 months of follow-up was significantly higher after TA than after CA in the RCTs [P < 0.001; relative risk (RR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.34-2.32] and in the retrospective cohort studies (P = 0.010; RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.12-2.51). The incidence of significant side effects during the post-procedural period was significantly higher in the TA group than in the CA group in both the RCT (P = 0.007; RR, 7.23; 95% CI, 1.71-30.49) and the retrospective cohort studies (P = 0.020; RR, 4.39; 95% CI, 1.33-14.46). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available data, TA was found to be more effective than CA in achieving freedom from atrial arrhythmia; however, TA had a higher rate of immediate post-procedural complications than CA. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | OXFORD UNIV PRESS | - |
dc.subject | PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION | - |
dc.subject | GANGLIONIC PLEXI ABLATION | - |
dc.subject | APPENDAGE EXCLUSION | - |
dc.subject | SURGICAL ABLATION | - |
dc.subject | MAZE PROCEDURE | - |
dc.subject | FOLLOW-UP | - |
dc.subject | TRIAL | - |
dc.subject | EFFICACY | - |
dc.subject | THERAPY | - |
dc.subject | SAFETY | - |
dc.title | Epicardial thoracoscopic ablation versus endocardial catheter ablation for management of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Hyun Jung | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Jin Suk | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/icvts/ivw027 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84974602017 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000377437200005 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, v.22, no.6, pp.729 - 737 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY | - |
dc.citation.title | INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 22 | - |
dc.citation.number | 6 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 729 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 737 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Cardiovascular System & Cardiology | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Respiratory System | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Respiratory System | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | GANGLIONIC PLEXI ABLATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | APPENDAGE EXCLUSION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SURGICAL ABLATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MAZE PROCEDURE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FOLLOW-UP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRIAL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EFFICACY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | THERAPY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SAFETY | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Atrial fibrillation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Thoracoscopy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Catheter ablation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Meta-analysis | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.