Does Trade Integration Contribute to Peace?
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jong-Wha | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pyun, Ju Hyun | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-04T03:19:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-04T03:19:01Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-18 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1363-6669 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/89587 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We investigate the effect of trade integration on interstate military conflict. Our empirical analysis, based on a large panel data set of 243,225 country-pair observations from 1950 to 2000, confirms that an increase in bilateral trade interdependence significantly promotes peace. It also suggests that the peace-promotion effect of bilateral trade integration is significantly higher for contiguous countries that are likely to experience more conflict. More importantly, we find that not only bilateral trade but global trade openness also significantly promotes peace. It shows, however, that an increase in global trade openness reduces the probability of interstate conflict more for countries far apart from each other than it does for countries sharing borders. The main finding of the peace-promotion effect of bilateral and global trade integration holds robust when controlling for the simultaneous determination of trade and peace. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | WILEY-BLACKWELL | - |
dc.subject | CONFLICT | - |
dc.subject | INTERDEPENDENCE | - |
dc.subject | WAR | - |
dc.title | Does Trade Integration Contribute to Peace? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Jong-Wha | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Pyun, Ju Hyun | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/rode.12222 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84955583433 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000370059200028 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, v.20, no.1, pp.327 - 344 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS | - |
dc.citation.title | REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS | - |
dc.citation.volume | 20 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 327 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 344 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Development Studies | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Development Studies | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Economics | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONFLICT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INTERDEPENDENCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | WAR | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.