Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical. Researchers-Part II. Statistical. Methods of Meta-Analysis

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Juneyoung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kyung Won-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Sang Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorHuh, Jimi-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Seong Ho-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-04T10:59:55Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-04T10:59:55Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-10-
dc.date.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.issn1229-6929-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/92024-
dc.description.abstractMeta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies differs from the usual meta-analysis of therapeutic/interventional studies in that, it is required to simultaneously analyze a pair of two outcome measures such as sensitivity and specificity, instead of a single outcome. Since sensitivity and specificity are generally inversely correlated and could be affected by a threshold effect, more sophisticated statistical methods are required for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Hierarchical models including the bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model are increasingly being accepted as standard methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. We provide a conceptual review of statistical methods currently used and recommended for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. This article could serve as a methodological reference for those who perform systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherKOREAN RADIOLOGICAL SOC-
dc.subjectREGRESSION-
dc.subjectMODELS-
dc.subjectCURVE-
dc.titleSystematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical. Researchers-Part II. Statistical. Methods of Meta-Analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Juneyoung-
dc.identifier.doi10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1188-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84946546422-
dc.identifier.wosid000365153200002-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, v.16, no.6, pp.1188 - 1196-
dc.relation.isPartOfKOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY-
dc.citation.titleKOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY-
dc.citation.volume16-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage1188-
dc.citation.endPage1196-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.identifier.kciidART002052801-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREGRESSION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMODELS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCURVE-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSystematic review-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMeta-analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDiagnostic test accuracy-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE