Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical Outcome of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Remnant Preservation

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSong, Jae-Gwang-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyun-Jung-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Jae Hwi-
dc.contributor.authorBhandare, Nikhl N.-
dc.contributor.authorShetty, Gautam M.-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Seung-Baik-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Young Woong-
dc.contributor.authorNha, Kyung Wook-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-04T13:18:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-04T13:18:15Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-18-
dc.date.issued2015-09-
dc.identifier.issn0749-8063-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/92705-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze clinical outcomes in patients who underwent posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) with and without remnant preservation. Methods: A search of the literature was performed with the established medical databases Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Register. Two authors screened the selected articles for title, abstract, and full text in accordance with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were as follows: English-language articles on isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury; clinical trials with a clear description of surgical technique; outcome evaluation using a well-defined knee score, arthrometry, and posterior stress radiography; follow-up longer than 2 years; and a Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) of 65 points or greater. The methodologic quality of all articles was assessed by 2 authors according to the CMS. Results: Eleven studies were included, with a mean CMS of 78.9 points (SD, 5.37 points). There was no direct comparative study between remnant-preserving PCLR and standard PCLR. At final follow-up, the knees of 72% to 100% of patients who underwent remnant-preserving PCLR and 41% to 95% of patients who underwent standard PCLR were rated as normal or nearly normal on the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee assessment. Patients who underwent remnant-preserving PCLR showed an increase of 16.4 to 47 points in Lysholm scores, and patients who underwent standard PCLR showed an increase of 22 to 29 points. The ranges of mean postoperative side-to-side differences on KT-1000 (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) testing were 0.7 to 2.8 mm in patients who underwent remnant-preserving PCLR and 1 to 3.5 mm in patients who underwent standard PCLR. The ranges of mean postoperative side-to-side differences on stress radiography were 2.2 to 5 mm in patients who underwent remnant-preserving PCLR and 4.7 to 6 mm in patients who underwent standard PCLR. Conclusions: All studies on PCLR with remnant preservation showed satisfactory outcomes despite using numerous surgical techniques, graft types, intervals from injury to surgery, and follow-up periods.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherW B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC-
dc.subject2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-
dc.subjectPOSTEROLATERAL CORNER RECONSTRUCTION-
dc.subjectARTHROSCOPIC SINGLE-BUNDLE-
dc.subjectACHILLES-TENDON ALLOGRAFT-
dc.subjectANTEROLATERAL BUNDLE-
dc.subjectINJURIES-
dc.subjectAUGMENTATION-
dc.subjectGRAFT-
dc.subjectMECHANORECEPTORS-
dc.subjectAUTOGRAFT-
dc.titleClinical Outcome of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Remnant Preservation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Hyun-Jung-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.018-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84940685539-
dc.identifier.wosid000362379600025-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, v.31, no.9, pp.1796 - 1806-
dc.relation.isPartOfARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY-
dc.citation.titleARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number9-
dc.citation.startPage1796-
dc.citation.endPage1806-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaOrthopedics-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaSport Sciences-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaSurgery-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryOrthopedics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySport Sciences-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySurgery-
dc.subject.keywordPlus2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPOSTEROLATERAL CORNER RECONSTRUCTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusARTHROSCOPIC SINGLE-BUNDLE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusACHILLES-TENDON ALLOGRAFT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusANTEROLATERAL BUNDLE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINJURIES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAUGMENTATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGRAFT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMECHANORECEPTORS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAUTOGRAFT-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE