Trends in the Effectiveness of Endovascular Recanalization for Acute Stroke: Is a Change Taking Place?
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Beom Joon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Han, Moon-Ku | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Tai Hwan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Sang-Soon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Kyung Bok | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Byung-Chul | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yu, Kyung-Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Mi Sun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cha, Jae Kwan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Dae-Hyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Soo Joo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ko, Youngchai | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Jong-Moo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Kyusik | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Yong-Jin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hong, Keun-Sik | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Joon-Tae | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Jay Chol | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Dong-Eog | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Juneyoung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Ji Sung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gorelick, Philip B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoon, Byung-Woo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bae, Hee-Joon | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-04T17:36:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-04T17:36:20Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-18 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1052-3057 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/93925 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Despite recent technical advances in endovascular recanalization, there is skepticism regarding its clinical effectiveness compared with intravenous thrombolysis for treating acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to delineate its effectiveness and safety and their change over time. Methods: Using a prospective, multicenter stroke registry database, we identified 872 patients with ischemic stroke who underwent recanalization therapy with intravenous thrombolysis alone (IVT; n = 533) or endovascular recanalization with or without intravenous thrombolysis (EVT; n = 339) between April 2008 and January 2012. All subjects had National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of 10 or more and arrived at the hospital within 4.5 hours of onset. Propensity score was used to address baseline imbalances between treatment groups, but balance adjustment was not performed for subgroup analyses. Results: The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at discharge. The year-by-year effectiveness and safety of EVT and IVT were compared. Before 2010, the primary outcome was not associated with the recanalization method. However, in 2011, EVT increased the odds of having a primary outcome compared with IVT (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-3.23). In 2011, EVT was superior to IVT regarding the achievement of a favorable outcome at 3 months after stroke (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.10-3.59). The odds of in-hospital mortality and 3-month mortality were not different over 4 years. Conclusions: There might have been a change in the effectiveness of endovascular recanalization compared with intravenous thrombolysis, but the results remain tentative until prospectively evaluated. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV | - |
dc.subject | ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE | - |
dc.subject | INTRAARTERIAL THERAPY | - |
dc.subject | PROPENSITY SCORE | - |
dc.subject | EARLY MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.subject | THROMBECTOMY | - |
dc.subject | OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject | TRIAL | - |
dc.subject | CARE | - |
dc.subject | REVASCULARIZATION | - |
dc.subject | ASSOCIATION | - |
dc.title | Trends in the Effectiveness of Endovascular Recanalization for Acute Stroke: Is a Change Taking Place? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Juneyoung | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.12.003 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000351856700030 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, v.24, no.4, pp.866 - 873 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES | - |
dc.citation.volume | 24 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 866 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 873 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Neurosciences & Neurology | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Cardiovascular System & Cardiology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Neurosciences | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Peripheral Vascular Disease | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INTRAARTERIAL THERAPY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PROPENSITY SCORE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EARLY MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | THROMBECTOMY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRIAL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CARE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | REVASCULARIZATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ASSOCIATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Acute ischemic stroke | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | endovascular recanalization | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | comparative effectiveness research | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | propensity score | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | thrombolysis | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.