Do analysts treat winners and losers differently when forecasting earnings?
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jung, Jay Heon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pae, Jinhan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoo, Choong-Yuel | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-04T17:44:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-04T17:44:14Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-18 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0169-2070 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/93980 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We investigate whether the well-known positive association between past stock returns and analysts' earnings forecast revisions differs for stocks that have experienced extreme positive (or negative) price changes. We document an asymmetry in this association depending on whether a stock experienced consecutive rounds of capital gains (winner) or losses (loser): the association is strong for losers, but weak for winners. We also find that earnings forecasts are less accurate for analysts who treat winners and losers differently from moderately-performing stocks. However, the degree of such aberrant reactions to winners and losers and the consequent detrimental effect on the forecasting accuracy are less acute for analysts who have more forecasting experience with winners and losers. Finally, consistent with the efficient market hypothesis (EMH), we find that investors discount earnings forecast revisions by analysts who treat winners and losers differently, particularly after 2003, coinciding with the Global Settlement that aims to improve the integrity of analyst research and investors' financial literacy. (C) 2014 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV | - |
dc.subject | STOCK RECOMMENDATIONS | - |
dc.subject | INDIVIDUAL ANALYSTS | - |
dc.subject | INVESTOR SENTIMENT | - |
dc.subject | ACCURACY | - |
dc.subject | REVISIONS | - |
dc.subject | RETURNS | - |
dc.subject | RESPOND | - |
dc.title | Do analysts treat winners and losers differently when forecasting earnings? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Pae, Jinhan | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.02.006 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84939885858 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000355369000022 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, v.31, no.2, pp.531 - 549 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING | - |
dc.citation.title | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING | - |
dc.citation.volume | 31 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 531 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 549 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Management | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | STOCK RECOMMENDATIONS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INDIVIDUAL ANALYSTS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INVESTOR SENTIMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ACCURACY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | REVISIONS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RETURNS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RESPOND | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Asymmetry | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Earnings forecast revisions | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Stock returns | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | The Global Settlement | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.