Standardizing the evaluation criteria on treatment outcomes of mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Ha-Young | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, Sang-Wan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jeong-Yol | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-05T04:40:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-05T04:40:28Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-15 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2005-7806 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/97266 | - |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE. The aim of this review was to analyze the evaluation criteria on mandibular implant overdentures through a systematic review and suggest standardized evaluation criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A systematic literature search was conducted by Pub Med search strategy and hand-searching of relevant journals from included studies considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) and clinical trial studies comparing attachment systems on mandibular implant overdentures until December, 2011 were selected. Twenty nine studies were finally selected and the data about evaluation methods were collected. RESULTS. Evaluation criteria could be classified into 4 groups (implant survival, pen-implant tissue evaluation, prosthetic evaluation, and patient satisfaction). Among 29 studies, 21 studies presented implant survival rate, while any studies reporting implant failure did not present cumulative implant survival rate. Seventeen studies evaluating pen-implant tissue status presented following items as evaluation criteria; marginal bone level (14), plaque Index (13), probing depth (8), bleeding index (8), attachment gingiva level (8), gingival index (6), amount of keratinized gingiva (1). Eighteen studies evaluating prosthetic maintenance and complication also presented following items as evaluation criteria; loose matrix (17), female detachment (15), denture fracture (15), denture relining (14), abutment fracture (14), abutment screw loosening (11), and occlusal adjustment (9). Atypical questionnaire (9), Visual analog scales (VAS) (4), and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) (1) were used as the format of criteria to evaluate patients satisfaction in 14 studies. CONCLUSION. For evaluation of implant overdenture, it is necessary to include cumulative survival rate for implant evaluation. It is suggested that pen-implant tissue evaluation criteria include marginal bone level, plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, and attached gingiva level. It is also suggested that prosthetic evaluation criteria include loose matrix, female detachment, denture fracture, denture relining, abutment fracture, abutment screw loosening, and occlusal adjustment. Finally standardized criteria like OHIP-EDENT or VAS are required for patient satisfaction. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | KOREAN ACAD PROSTHODONTICS | - |
dc.subject | RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL | - |
dc.subject | UNSPLINTED ORAL IMPLANTS | - |
dc.subject | DIFFERENT ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS | - |
dc.subject | DIFFERENT LOADING PROTOCOLS | - |
dc.subject | MARGINAL BONE LOSS | - |
dc.subject | 8-YEAR FOLLOW-UP | - |
dc.subject | SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES | - |
dc.subject | 2-IMPLANT OVERDENTURES | - |
dc.subject | PATIENT SATISFACTION | - |
dc.subject | PROSTHODONTIC MAINTENANCE | - |
dc.title | Standardizing the evaluation criteria on treatment outcomes of mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Shin, Sang-Wan | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Jeong-Yol | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.325 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84908885886 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000344306700001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, v.6, no.5, pp.325 - 332 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS | - |
dc.citation.volume | 6 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 325 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 332 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001922405 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | UNSPLINTED ORAL IMPLANTS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIFFERENT ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIFFERENT LOADING PROTOCOLS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MARGINAL BONE LOSS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | 8-YEAR FOLLOW-UP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | 2-IMPLANT OVERDENTURES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PATIENT SATISFACTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PROSTHODONTIC MAINTENANCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Denture | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Overlay | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Mandibular prosthesis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Dental implants | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Outcome assessment | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Patient satisfaction | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.