Prediction and optimization of electrospinning parameters for polymethyl methacrylate nanofiber fabrication using response surface methodology and artificial neural networks
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Khanlou, Hossein Mohammad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sadollah, Ali | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ang, Bee Chin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Joong Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Talebian, Sepehr | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ghadimi, Azadeh | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-05T06:01:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-05T06:01:28Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-15 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-09 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0941-0643 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/97633 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Since the fiber diameter determines the mechanical, electrical, and optical properties of electrospun nanofiber mats, the effect of material and process parameters on electrospun polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) fiber diameter were studied. Accordingly, the prediction and optimization of input factors were performed using the response surface methodology (RSM) with the design of experiments technique and artificial neural networks (ANNs). A central composite design of RSM was employed to develop a mathematical model as well as to define the optimum condition. A three-layered feed-forward ANN model was designed and used for the prediction of the response factor, namely the PMMA fiber diameter (in nm). The parameters studied were polymer concentration (13-28 wt%), feed rate (1-5 mL/h), and tip-to-collector distance (10-23 cm). From the analysis of variance, the most significant factor that caused a remarkable impact on the experimental design response was identified. The predicted responses using the RSM and ANNs were compared in figures and tables. In general, the ANNs outperformed the RSM in terms of accuracy and prediction of obtained results. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER | - |
dc.subject | POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE) | - |
dc.subject | DIAMETER | - |
dc.subject | DESIGN | - |
dc.subject | FIBERS | - |
dc.subject | MODEL | - |
dc.subject | JETS | - |
dc.title | Prediction and optimization of electrospinning parameters for polymethyl methacrylate nanofiber fabrication using response surface methodology and artificial neural networks | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Joong Hoon | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00521-014-1554-8 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84892942251 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000340584700024 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, v.25, no.3-4, pp.767 - 777 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS | - |
dc.citation.title | NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS | - |
dc.citation.volume | 25 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3-4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 767 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 777 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Computer Science | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE) | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIAMETER | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DESIGN | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FIBERS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MODEL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | JETS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Electrospinning parameters | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nanofibers | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Response surface methodology | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Artificial neural networks | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.