Diagnostic Utility: Experimental Demonstrations and Replications of Powerful Question Effects in High-Stakes Deception Detection
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Levine, Timothy R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Blair, J. Pete | - |
dc.contributor.author | Clare, David D. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-05T10:03:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-05T10:03:28Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-15 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0360-3989 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/98843 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The concept of diagnostic utility was used to create questions that would differentially affect deception detection accuracy. Six deception detection studies show that subtle differences in questioning produced accuracy rates that were predictably, substantially, and reliably above and below chance. The first 3 detection studies demonstrate that diagnostically useful questioning can reliably achieve accuracy rates over 70% with student and experienced judges. The fourth and fifth experiments demonstrated negative diagnostic utility among federal investigators but not students. The final experiment crossed 3 sets of interview questions with experience. Strong question effects produced a swing in accuracy from 32 to 73%. A questioning by experience interaction was also obtained. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | WILEY-BLACKWELL | - |
dc.subject | DETECTION ACCURACY | - |
dc.subject | LIES | - |
dc.subject | CUES | - |
dc.subject | JUDGMENTS | - |
dc.subject | ABILITY | - |
dc.subject | MODEL | - |
dc.title | Diagnostic Utility: Experimental Demonstrations and Replications of Powerful Question Effects in High-Stakes Deception Detection | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Levine, Timothy R. | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/hcre.12021 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84897618281 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000332836700006 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, v.40, no.2, pp.262 - 289 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH | - |
dc.citation.title | HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH | - |
dc.citation.volume | 40 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 262 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 289 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Communication | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Communication | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DETECTION ACCURACY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LIES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CUES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | JUDGMENTS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ABILITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MODEL | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.