Fully automatic coronary calcium scoring in non-ECG-gated low-dose chest CT: comparison with ECG-gated cardiac CT

초록

Objectives To validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based fully automatic coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring system on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) using multi-institutional datasets with manual CAC scoring as the reference standard. Methods This retrospective study included 452 subjects from three academic institutions, who underwent both ECG-gated calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT) and LDCT scans. For all CSCT and LDCT scans, automatic CAC scoring (CAC_auto) was performed using AI-based software, and manual CAC scoring (CAC_man) was set as the reference standard. The reliability and agreement of CAC_auto was evaluated and compared with that of CAC_man using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. The reliability between CAC_auto and CAC_man for CAC severity categories was analyzed using weighted kappa (kappa) statistics. Results CAC_auto on CSCT and LDCT yielded a high ICC (0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.998-0.999 and 0.989, 95% CI 0.987-0.991, respectively) and a mean difference with 95% limits of agreement of 1.3 +/- 37.1 and 0.8 +/- 75.7, respectively. CAC_auto achieved excellent reliability for CAC severity (kappa = 0.918-0.972) on CSCT and good to excellent but heterogenous reliability among datasets (kappa = 0.748-0.924) on LDCT. Conclusions The application of an AI-based automatic CAC scoring software to LDCT shows good to excellent reliability in CAC score and CAC severity categorization in multi-institutional datasets; however, the reliability varies among institutions.

키워드