독일 집단적 노사관계법상 판례 법리의 주요 특징 - 노사관계 안정화를 위한 노동조합 및 단체협약적용 관련 판례이론을 중심으로 -

The Principle of Judicial Decisions on German Labor Relations Laws - On the Decisions treating with Labor Unions and Collective Bargaining Agreements for the Stable Labor Relations
  • 박종희

초록

A lots of the principles in German labor relations laws have been developed by judicial decisions because the effective acts did not exist for the labor relations. Most of all, the Federal Court of Labor has still maintained two important principles, even though many scholars have objected them. The one is the principle of social power to be legally recognized as the labor union. The other one is only one agreement to be binding, when collective agreements happen to exist in plural. This is to explore the implications of the judgments of the Federal Court of Labor for us with specific cases. The judgments and interpretations of the court could be a kind of guidance for some complex issues surrounding the provisions of single bargaining unit to be effective next year in Korea. The Federal Court of Labor in Germany tends to put emphasis on the legal stability rather than the logic of legal theory. It can be considered as very useful methods to interpretate and apply our labor relations laws in the future.

키워드

사회적 세력쟁의행위준비태세단일 단체협약 적용의 원칙단체협약의 경합단체협약의 병존노동조합 개념단결체와 노동조합교섭창구단일화교섭대표기구교섭대표노조공동교섭대표단social powerpreparation to strikesingle collective bargaining agreementthe conflict of collective agreementscollective agreements in parallelthe define of labor unionassociation and labor unionsingle bargaining unitrepresentative bodyrepresentative labor unionjoint representatives for collective bargaining
제목
독일 집단적 노사관계법상 판례 법리의 주요 특징 - 노사관계 안정화를 위한 노동조합 및 단체협약적용 관련 판례이론을 중심으로 -
제목 (타언어)
The Principle of Judicial Decisions on German Labor Relations Laws - On the Decisions treating with Labor Unions and Collective Bargaining Agreements for the Stable Labor Relations
저자
박종희
발행일
2010
저널명
고려법학
58
페이지
395 ~ 429