Saving Human Rights from Cultural Relativism with Compassion

Saving Human Rights from Cultural Relativism with Compassion

초록

How can we justify the idea of universal human rights? Can wesave universal human rights from cultural relativism with compassionrather than reason? Reason has served as the predominant basis ofhuman rights since the era of Enlightenment. However, an adequatesource of human rights required today is decisively universal, but atthe same time considerably sensitive to the abundant diversity ofmoral values. We respond to this question by critically examining thehuman rights theories of Richard Rorty and Martha Nussbaum, alongwith moral sentiment theories of David Hume and Adam Smith. Weargue first that moral sentiment is no less a foundational source thancontextual; second, compassion rather than reason constitutes thefoundational source of human beings. In developing each point, wesubject to careful analysis of Hume's view on the foundation ofmorality and Smith's idea of the impartial spectator. Reason andcompassion are both essential for an individual to be moral, but, moreimportantly, we argue that compassion is the source of moralitywhich makes every human being entitled to universal human rights.

키워드

universal human rights; cultural relativism; compassion; sympathy; impartial spectator; Hume; Smith; Rorty; Nussbaum; Sen
제목
Saving Human Rights from Cultural Relativism with Compassion
제목 (타언어)
Saving Human Rights from Cultural Relativism with Compassion
저자
김남국; 김동헌
발행일
2014
저널명
평화연구
권
22
호
1
페이지
435 ~ 480