상세 보기
중국, 일본, 한국의 정보매개자책임제한제도의 비교
Comparison of Intermediary Liability Safe Harbours of China, Japan, and Korea
초록
This article compares the intermediary liability safe harbour rules of China, Japan, and Korea and highlights how, although the commentators of all countries describe their respective rules as ‘safe harbours’ resembling section 512 of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act there seems to be confusion. It describes how China and South Korea inadvertently created a liability-imposing rule instead of a liability-exempting rule. Further, it reviews Japan’s statutes that set out liability-exempting regimes closely resembling the EU e-Commerce Directive. It further discusses the importance of distinguishing between a liability-imposing rule and a liability-exempting one in the light of the Asian examples.
키워드
China; Japan; South Korea; online intermediaries; safe harbour; liability; notice and takedown; 중국; 일본; 한국; 정보매개자; 책임제한; 책임; 노티스앤테이크다운
- 제목
- 중국, 일본, 한국의 정보매개자책임제한제도의 비교
- 제목 (타언어)
- Comparison of Intermediary Liability Safe Harbours of China, Japan, and Korea
- 저자
- 박경신
- 발행일
- 2020
- 저널명
- 동북아법연구
- 권
- 13
- 호
- 3
- 페이지
- 317 ~ 341