Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies

  • Phan, K.
  • Kahlaee, H. R.
  • Kim, S. H.
  • Toh, J. W. T.
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

65
Citations

SCOPUS

68

초록

BackgroundThe usage of robotic surgery in rectal cancer is increasing, but there is an ongoing debate as to whether it provides any benefit. The aim of the present study was to determine if robotic surgery results in less conversion to an open operation than laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.MethodsA meta-analysis was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using Ovid Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ACP Journal Club and Database of Abstracts of Review of Effectiveness. Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score-matched (PSM) studies comparing a robotic vs. laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer surgery. The primary endpoint was conversion to open. All statistical analyses and data synthesis were conducted using STATA/IC version 142, Windows 64 bit (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA)ResultsSix hundred and twenty-one studies were identified through electronic database search. After application of selection criteria as per PRISMA and MOOSE criteria, six RCTs and five PSM articles were analyzed. From the six RCTs, 512 robotic and 519 laparoscopic cases were evaluated. There was a significantly lower rate of conversion for the robotic surgery arm (4.1% vs. 8.1%, OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.00-0.57). Of the five PSM studies, 2097 robotic and 3053 laparoscopic cases were evaluated. There was a significantly lower conversion to open rate found in the robotic surgery cohort (7.4% vs. 15.6%; OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.30-0.47). Pooled RCT and PSM data demonstrated significantly lower conversion rates for robotic surgery (6.7% vs. 14.5%; OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.30-0.46).ConclusionsRobotic surgery for rectal cancer is associated with reduced conversion to open surgery compared to a laparoscopic approach.

키워드

Robotic surgical proceduresLaparoscopic surgeryRECTUMsurgRectal cancerConversion to open surgeryMeta-analysisSHORT-TERM OUTCOMESTOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISIONLOW ANTERIOR RESECTIONPATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMESASSISTED RESECTIONIMPACTRISK
제목
Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies
저자
Phan, K.Kahlaee, H. R.Kim, S. H.Toh, J. W. T.
DOI
10.1007/s10151-018-1920-0
발행일
2019-03
유형
Review
저널명
Techniques in Coloproctology
23
3
페이지
221 ~ 230