단체협약 시정명령제도의 운용실태와 한계

A Review of the Administrative Order to Modify Unlawful Contents of Collective Bargaining Agreement
  • 강선희

초록

「Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act」(TULRAA), section 31(3) provide that “an administrative agency can order to modify unlawful contents of collective agreement with the consent of Labor Relations Commission.”It means that labor authorities can supervise and interfere with collective agreements by labor and management. Furthermore, the Act imposes fines of up to 5 million for the order violations (Section 93 no.2)The administrative order, however, has considerable issues which could infringe the principle of industrial autonomy in the law of collective bargaining agreement. Then, the constitutionality of the sections is controversial lately. The courts held that the section 31(3) is constitutional but the section 93 no.2 could be unconstitutional. The judgment have been referred to the Constitutional Court of Korea and now we have expected the decision of the Court. This report reviews the history, meaning and limits of the administrative order in the aspect of the constitutionality. In conclusion, the administrative order could be easily misuse by labor authorities and should be repealed by a new legislation. If the order would have some preventive effects, as advocates of the sections have propounded it, the provision to prevent possible abuses of labor authorities's order should be prepared.

키워드

administrative order to modify unlawful contents of collective agreementadministrative agencyillegalitylimit of industrial autonomyunfair labor practicescriminal penalty for the order violations단체협약의 시정명령제도행정관청위법성협약자치의 한계부당노동행위시정명령 불이행시 형사처벌
제목
단체협약 시정명령제도의 운용실태와 한계
제목 (타언어)
A Review of the Administrative Order to Modify Unlawful Contents of Collective Bargaining Agreement
저자
강선희
발행일
2012
저널명
노동법학
42
페이지
35 ~ 72