회생절차에 있어서 강제인가의 요건과 그 방법

초록

In the reorganization procedure, various classes of stakeholders participate. The law helps them make a group decision by classifying them into secured creditors, unsecured creditors, shareholders and interest holders and requiring a vote by each class on the reorganization plan (Article 236). The adoption of the reorganization plan requires the affirmative vote by all classes. However,even if the affirmative vote in one or more classes is less than the legal threshold for approval, the court is allowed to approve the reorganization plan (Article 244). This measure is called cramdown. It is intended to promote the efficient reorganization of a debtor and the protection of the rights of the stakeholders in a non-approving class on the basis that it is not socio-economically desirable to prevent a reorganization procedure for a debtor that deserves the reorganization only because of unreasonable demands by certain stakeholders. In this paper, the focus is on the detailed review of the contents and the meanings of the laws relating to the legal requirements and specific processes for the cramdown. In Chapter 2, the specific legal requirements for the courts to set forth the protection conditions and cram down the plan are reviewed in detail. Also included in this review is the general requirements for the approval of the reorganization plan as a part of such specific legal requirements. In Chapter 3, the procedures to set forth the protection conditions are divided into making the protection conditions before and after the plan is disapproved and the legal implications in each case are analyzed. Through this analysis, it is attempted to set forth the reasonable basis for understanding fairness and equity, relative priority rule and absolute priority rule, best interest of creditors principle, etc.

키워드

강제인가회생절차회생계획공정과 형평절대우선설상대우선설계획의 수행가능성부당한 차별회생계획의 인가청산가치보장의 원칙CramdownReorganization ProcedureReorganization PlanFair and EquitableAbsolute Priority TheoryRelative Priority TheoryFeasibility of PlanUnfair DiscriminationConfirmation of PlanBest Interest of Creditors Principle
제목
회생절차에 있어서 강제인가의 요건과 그 방법
저자
김경욱
발행일
2011
저널명
민사소송
15
2
페이지
453 ~ 493