Delayed vs Immediate Coloanal Anastomosis after Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Kitaguchi, Daichi; 
  • Seow-En, Isaac; 
  • Shen, Ming-Yin; 
  • Ke, Tao-Wei; 
  • Kim, Ji-Seon; 
  • ... Kim, Jin; 
  • 외 2명
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

7
Citations

SCOPUS

8

초록

BACKGROUND:Despite increasing interest in Turnbull-Cutait pull-through delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) for low rectal cancer, its advantages over conventional immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICAA) with a diverting stoma remain unclear. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between DCAA and ICAA after elective total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer.STUDY DESIGN:This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent elective minimally invasive total mesorectal excision with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis (ICAA or DCAA) for primary low rectal adenocarcinoma. The primary outcome was the overall 30-day postoperative complication rate. Postoperative anorectal function was assessed using the low anterior resection syndrome and Wexner scores 1 and 2 years postoperatively.RESULTS:A total of 305 consecutive patients (109 delayed and 196 immediate) were assessed. The overall 30-day postoperative complication rate was 25%, with a significantly lower incidence in the DCAA group compared with the ICAA group (15% vs 31%, p = 0.002). Both early (within 30 days) and late (after 30 days) anastomosis-related complications were significantly lower in the DCAA group than that in the ICAA group, at 7% vs 15%, p = 0.047, and 2% vs 11%, p = 0.005, respectively. Two years postoperatively, the DCAA cohort had a significantly lower proportion of patients with major low anterior resection syndrome (38% vs 60%, p = 0.018) and severe incontinence (0% vs 8%, p = 0.029).CONCLUSIONS:DCAA without a diverting stoma for low rectal cancer removes the risks associated with stoma creation and closure-related morbidity. DCAA is also linked to significantly lower postoperative morbidity and improved anorectal function at 2 years compared with ICAA with a diverting stoma. DCAA may therefore be the optimal anastomotic method for patients with low rectal cancer.

키워드

Anastomotic Leak; Fecal Incontinence; Rectal Neoplasm; Restorative Proctocolectomy; Surgical Anastomosis; Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Anal Canal; Anastomosis; Clinical Trial; Colon; Comparative Study; Epidemiology; Female; Human; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Study; Postoperative Complication; Procedures; Proctectomy; Rectum; Rectum Tumor; Retrospective Study; Surgery; Time Factor; Treatment Outcome; Very Elderly; Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 And Over; Anal Canal; Anastomosis, Surgical; Colon; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Proctectomy; Rectal Neoplasms; Rectum; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; STOMA; ILEOSTOMIES; MORBIDITY; RISK
제목
Delayed vs Immediate Coloanal Anastomosis after Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
저자
Kitaguchi, Daichi; Seow-En, Isaac; Shen, Ming-Yin; Ke, Tao-Wei; Kim, Ji-Seon; Kim, Jin; Ito, Masaaki; Chen, William Tzu-Liang
DOI
10.1097/XCS.0000000000001410
발행일
2025-09
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
권
241
호
3
페이지
448 ~ 459